Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Sacubitril/Valsartan plus RFCA improves rhythm control in hypertensive NPAF patientsARNI plus RFCA improves heart rhythm control in hypertension patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider ARNI plus ablation for rhythm control in hypertensive NPAF patients, especially with reduced EF or low-voltage areas.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 240 patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation and hypertension who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation. Participants were assigned to receive sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) plus ablation or ablation alone. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter for at least 30 seconds without antiarrhythmic medications at 15 months after a 3-month blanking period.

At 15 months, maintenance of sinus rhythm was higher in the ARNI group (79.8%) versus the control group (69.4%), with a hazard ratio of 0.59 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.98; P=0.04). The ARNI group also had a smaller left atrial diameter (adjusted mean difference -1.9 mm; 95% CI -3.2 to -0.5; P=0.02) and lower NT-proBNP levels (adjusted median difference -34 pg/ml; 95% CI -62 to -6; P=0.03).

Among patients who recurred, AF incidence was lower in the ARNI group (50.0% vs 62.2%; P=0.01). Success rates were higher with ARNI in patients with EF <50% (93.6% vs 61.1%; P=0.01) and in those with low-voltage areas (80.0% vs 61.3%; P=0.02). Safety and tolerability data were not reported.

Key limitations include the specific population of hypertensive NPAF patients post-ablation and the 15-month follow-up duration. The practice relevance suggests ARNI may improve prognosis in this subgroup, particularly for those with reduced EF or low-voltage areas. Results should not be generalized to non-hypertensive patients.

A randomized trial tested if adding sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) to a standard heart procedure (RFCA) would help patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation and high blood pressure. The study included 240 patients and followed them for 15 months after a 3-month healing period.

Patients who received ARNI plus the procedure were more likely to stay in normal heart rhythm compared to those who only had the procedure. About 80% of the ARNI group succeeded, versus about 69% of the control group. This represents about a 30% lower chance of rhythm problems.

The ARNI group also saw a smaller left atrial size and lower NT-proBNP levels, which are signs of better heart health. Patients with weaker heart function or specific heart tissue areas benefited even more, with success rates over 90% versus about 60%.

The study did not report on side effects or safety issues. It was limited to patients with high blood pressure who had a specific heart procedure, so results may not apply to everyone.

This research suggests that ARNI can be a helpful add-on treatment for certain patients after a heart procedure, improving their chances of staying in normal rhythm and overall heart health.

What this means for you:
Adding sacubitril/valsartan to a heart procedure significantly improves rhythm control in hypertension patients.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up3.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: The efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) alone for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF) is unsatisfactory. This study investigated the effect of sacubitril/valsartan, a type of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), on NPAF patients with hypertension who underwent RFCA and analysed the possible influencing factors. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 240 NPAF patients were randomly divided into a control group (n = 121) and an ARNI group (n = 119). The primary outcome was freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter (AT/AFL) for ≥ 30 s without antiarrhythmic medications at 15 months after the 3-month blanking period. The secondary outcomes included recurrence types, blood pressure, echocardiographic parameters and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. RESULTS: At 15 months, a higher maintenance rate of sinus rhythm was achieved in the ARNI group compared to the control group (79.8% vs. 69.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.98; P = 0.04). Moreover, a smaller left atrial diameter (adjusted mean difference -1.9 mm [95% CI -3.2 to -0.5], P = 0.02) and lower NT-proBNP level (adjusted median difference -34 pg/ml [95% CI -62 to -6], P = 0.03) were observed in the ARNI group than in the control group at 15 months. Among the patients who recurred, a lower incidence of AF (50.0% vs. 62.2%, P = 0.01) was found in the ARNI group, but presented a significantly higher incidence of AT/AFL. In the subgroup analysis, compared with those in the control group, more patients in the ARNI group achieved success in patients with EF < 50% (93.6% vs. 61.1%, P = 0.01) or low-voltage areas (LVAs) (80.0% vs. 61.3%, P = 0.02). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that ARNI was an independent protective factor against AF or AT/AFL recurrence in patients with EF < 50% or LVAs at 15 months. CONCLUSION: ARNI is effective in NPAF patients with hypertension after RFCA, especially those with EF < 50% or LVAs, which can significantly improve their prognosis.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.