Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Observational EHR study suggests GLP-1 RA may have lower risk than SGLT2i for HF outcomes

Observational EHR study suggests GLP-1 RA may have lower risk than SGLT2i for HF outcomes
Photo by Pawel Czerwinski / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Interpret single-center observational EHR data comparing GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i in HF with caution; validation is needed.

This observational study used real-world electronic health record data from Stony Brook University Hospital to compare the effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) versus sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with heart failure. The primary outcome was a 1-year composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure-related hospitalization. The analysis, which employed causal machine learning methods, found that GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower risk for this composite outcome compared to SGLT2i use. Specific effect sizes, absolute numbers, p-values, and confidence intervals were not reported. Safety and tolerability data were also not reported. The study has important limitations. The authors note there is limited evidence for individualized treatment selection based on this analysis. Subgroup tests suggested that loop diuretic use, body mass index, and estimated glomerular filtration rate may be potential effect modifiers, but these findings are exploratory. The authors emphasize that careful assessment of causal assumptions and rigorous validation are essential before any clinical implementation. While the analytical models show promise for translating observational data into precision care insights, this remains a preliminary, hypothesis-generating study from a single center. Its practice relevance is currently restrained to highlighting areas for future prospective research.

Study Details

EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Clinicians lack precision medicine tools to estimate individualized treatment effects for patients with heart failure (HF). Causal machine learning leveraging electronic health records can estimate both average and individualized treatment effects, enabling estimation of treatment heterogeneity. Using Stony Brook University Hospital data, we compared the effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) versus sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with HF. Under a doubly robust framework, we found a stable population-average effect: GLP-1 RA was associated with a lower risk than SGLT2i for a 1-year composite outcome of all-cause mortality or HF-related hospitalization. Heterogeneity analyses provided limited evidence for individualized treatment selection, although subgroup tests identified loop diuretic use, body mass index, and estimated glomerular filtration rate as potential effect modifiers. While these models hold promise for translating observational data into actionable precision care, careful assessment of causal assumptions and rigorous validation are essential before clinical implementation.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.