AI-assisted echocardiography shows moderate agreement with cardiologists in ATTR-CM monitoring
This retrospective observational study assessed the performance of a fully automated, AI-assisted echocardiographic algorithm (Us2.ai) in 62 patients with transthyretin cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) undergoing serial annual echocardiograms. The primary outcome measured agreement and reproducibility of automated measurements compared to those obtained by a reference cardiologist, a second cardiologist, and a novice reader. Secondary outcomes included interrater agreement, intrarater variability, and AI repeatability.
For interventricular septum thickness (IVSd), the AI showed moderate agreement with the reference cardiologist, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.65 and a negative bias of -1.9 mm. For left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), agreement was also moderate (ICC 0.51) with a negative bias of -39 mL. In contrast, interrater agreement between the two cardiologists was good for both IVSd (ICC 0.79, bias -0.2 mm) and LVEDV (ICC 0.84, bias +3 mL). Intrarater variability for both cardiologists was moderate to excellent, with limits of agreement ranging from 2.7 mm to 43 mL. AI repeatability limits of agreement were 3.6 mm and 37 mL, comparable to experienced cardiologists. The novice reader demonstrated higher variability, with limits of agreement of 5.1 mm and 61 mL.
No adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or tolerability issues were reported, as this was a diagnostic accuracy study. Key limitations include the retrospective study design and the lack of reported funding or conflicts of interest. The study supports the use of automated analysis for longitudinal echocardiographic monitoring in ATTR-CM, but results should be interpreted with caution given the association-only nature of the data and the moderate agreement observed between the AI and expert human readers.