Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Early integration of palliative care improves spiritual well-being in heart failure patients with LVEF > 40%Early Palliative Care Shows Specific Benefits for Heart Failure Patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that EIPC improves spiritual well-being in heart failure patients with LVEF > 40% but not overall HRQOL.

This exploratory secondary analysis evaluated the impact of early integration of palliative care (EIPC) compared to standard care in 205 patients with symptomatic heart failure over a 12-month follow-up period.

Primary outcomes included patient-reported measures such as KCCQ, FACIT-PAL, HADS, MIDOS, and FACIT-SP12. Results showed that KCCQ scores, HADS-anxiety, and MIDOS symptom intensity improved significantly over 12 months in both the EIPC and control groups. For the HFrEF subgroup, HADS-depression scores were reduced in both groups (EIPC: -1.37; control: -1.99).

A significant finding was observed in the LVEF > 40% subgroup, where EIPC produced a significant improvement in spiritual well-being compared with standard care (mean difference 3.47; 95% CI: 0.32 to 6.62; p=0.031). The control group in this subgroup showed no improvement.

Mortality and hospitalization rates did not differ between the EIPC and standard care groups. Safety data and adverse events were not reported. As an exploratory secondary analysis, these findings should be interpreted with caution regarding the general impact of EIPC on overall quality of life or symptom burden beyond specific spiritual outcomes.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding addresses a gap in the management of heart failure by evaluating the specific impact of palliative care. While prior evidence showed that multidisciplinary palliative rehabilitation improves quality of life in advanced life limiting illness, this study indicates that EIPC did not improve overall HRQOL or mood in heart failure patients, except for spiritual well-being in those with LVEF > 40%.

This study looked at how early integration of palliative care (EIPC) affected 205 patients with symptomatic heart failure. Researchers compared those receiving early palliative care to those receiving standard care over a 12-month period. They measured several factors, including quality of life, anxiety, depression, and physical symptoms.

The results showed that both groups improved in several areas, including overall quality of life, anxiety levels, and the intensity of physical symptoms. However, the study found that early palliative care did not provide any additional benefits over standard care for most general symptoms or mood.

A specific finding was noted for a subgroup of patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than 40%. In this specific group, early palliative care led to a significant improvement in spiritual well-being compared to standard care. Because this was an exploratory secondary analysis, the results are not yet enough to change standard medical practice. Patients should talk to their doctors about how palliative care might fit their specific needs.

What this means for you:
Early palliative care showed specific benefits for spiritual well-being in a subset of heart failure patients.

Common questions

Does early palliative care improve symptoms for heart failure patients?

The study found that patients in both the early palliative care group and the standard care group showed significant improvements in symptom intensity over 12 months. However, the early palliative care group did not show better results than the standard care group for overall quality of life, mood, or symptom burden.

Who specifically benefited from early palliative care in this study?

While most outcomes were similar between groups, patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than 40% showed a significant improvement in spiritual well-being when receiving early palliative care compared to standard care.

Did early palliative care reduce hospital stays or deaths?

The study found no difference between the early palliative care group and the standard care group regarding mortality or hospitalization rates over the 12-month follow-up period.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 205
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
INTRODUCTION: Early integration of palliative care (EIPC) has been proposed to improve quality of life in heart failure (HF), but evidence is mixed and potential differences by HF subtype remain unclear. This exploratory secondary analysis of the EPCHF trial examined whether patient-reported outcomes differed between patients with and without reduced EF. METHODS: A total of 205 patients with symptomatic HF were randomized 1:1 to EIPC or standard care in the EPCHF trial. For this exploratory analysis, patients were stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (≤ 40% vs > 40%). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed over 12 months using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care (FACIT-PAL), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), MIDOS, and FACIT-SP12. RESULTS: KCCQ scores, HADS-anxiety, and MIDOS symptom intensity improved significantly over 12 months in both EIPC and control groups, with no significant between-group differences in either EF subgroup. Reductions in HADS-depression occurred only in patients with HFrEF, with similar improvements in both EIPC (-1.37; 95% CI: -2.31 to -0.44; p = 0.004) and control (-1.99; 95% CI: -2.89 to -1.09; p < 0.001). Among patients with LVEF > 40%, EIPC produced a significant improvement in spiritual well-being compared with standard care (mean difference 3.47; 95% CI: 0.32 to 6.62; p = 0.031), whereas the control group showed no improvement. Mortality and hospitalization rates did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: In this exploratory EF-stratified analysis of EPCHF trial, EIPC did not improve overall HRQOL, mood, or symptom burden compared with standard care. A significant effect was observed only for spiritual well-being in patients with LVEF > 40%, suggesting that this subgroup may have distinct supportive-care needs warranting further investigation.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.