Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

SGLT2i use linked to lower adherence and QOL in HF patients in cross-sectional MTAC study

SGLT2i use linked to lower adherence and QOL in HF patients in cross-sectional MTAC study
Photo by Faustina Okeke / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that SGLT2i use in HF may correlate with lower adherence and QOL in observational data.

This cross-sectional study involved 78 heart failure patients enrolled in a medication therapy adherence clinic (MTAC) program at a secondary hospital in Shah Alam, Malaysia. It assessed therapeutic intensity, including full guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), SGLT2 inhibitor use, and medication load, compared to patients not on full GDMT or ARNI, with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as adherence, treatment burden, and quality of life as primary and secondary measures.

Main results showed SGLT2i users had significantly lower adherence (p = 0.037) and quality of life (p = 0.018) compared to others, while medication load had a positive correlation with quality of life (r = 0.295, p = 0.009). No associations were found between full GDMT and adherence, burden, or quality of life, or between medication load and adherence or burden. Patients on full GDMT or ARNI had similar scores to those not on these therapies across all outcomes.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the exploratory nature of the findings, which may reflect differences in disease severity or treatment complexity rather than a direct effect of therapy, and the need for confirmation in larger, longitudinal studies with appropriate adjustment for clinical variables. In practice, these observational insights highlight the importance of monitoring patient-reported outcomes in HF management, but avoid overstating causation due to the study's design and small sample size.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and newer agents such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have significantly improved outcomes in heart failure (HF). However, their impact on patient experience—including medication adherence, treatment burden, and quality of life (QOL)—remains less understood in Malaysia, especially in structured outpatient settings such as Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic (MTAC). To evaluate associations between therapeutic intensity (full GDMT, SGLT2i use, and medication load) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in HF patients enrolled in an MTAC program. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 78 HF patients at a secondary hospital MTAC in Shah Alam, Malaysia. PROs were assessed using the Malaysia Medication Adherence Assessment Tool (MyMAAT-12), the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ), and WHOQOL-BREF. Full GDMT was defined as concurrent use of a RAAS inhibitor, beta blocker, MRA, and SGLT2i. Group comparisons were performed using Mann–Whitney U tests, and associations between medication load and PROs were assessed using Spearman correlation. The mean age of patients was 57.3 ± 11.5 years; 74.4% were male. Most were on polypharmacy (mean medication classes: 6.6 ± 1.2); 64.1% were on full GDMT and 82.1% were prescribed SGLT2i. Median adherence, burden, and QOL scores were 47.0 (IQR: 40.0–53.0), 39.0 (IQR: 24.0–58.0), and 88.0 (IQR: 77.0–98.0), respectively. Patients on full GDMT or ARNI had similar adherence, burden, and QOL scores compared to those not on these therapies. However, SGLT2i users reported significantly lower adherence (p = 0.037) and QOL (p = 0.018). Medication load was positively correlated with QOL (r = 0.295, p = 0.009), but not with adherence or burden. In this MTAC-supported cohort, polypharmacy and full GDMT were not associated with increased burden or reduced adherence. A modest positive association between medication count and QOL was observed. SGLT2i use was associated with lower adherence and QOL, although these findings are exploratory and may reflect differences in disease severity or treatment complexity rather than a direct effect of therapy. Overall, these results provide observational insights into the relationship between therapeutic intensity and PROs within a pharmacist-led care setting, and warrant confirmation in larger, longitudinal studies with appropriate adjustment for clinical variables.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.