Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Rule-based Clinical Decision Support System Matches Expert Assessments in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Rule-based Clinical Decision Support System Matches Expert Assessments in Heart Failure With Preserv…
Photo by Vitaly Gariev / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider CDSS utility for diastolic function assessment in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using cohort data.

This prospective cohort study involved 134 patients with exertional dyspnea and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction defined as LVEF >50%. The investigation utilized semi-supine bicycle stress echocardiography to evaluate diagnostic performance. Data collection occurred during the stress testing session. The study design allowed for direct comparison of automated versus manual interpretation methods. The primary objective focused on the automated assessment of left ventricular diastolic function within this specific clinical population.

Researchers compared a rule-based Clinical Decision Support System against expert assessments as the comparator. The system achieved 93% of cases matching expert assessments for the primary outcome. Additionally, the intervention demonstrated 85% correct identification of stress-induced diastolic dysfunction. Diagnostic agreement between the automated system and experts showed an ICC > 0.94. Discrimination performance was quantified with an AUC = 0.92. These metrics reflect the system's analytical capabilities.

Safety data regarding adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported in this study. No specific limitations were documented in the provided evidence structure. The practice relevance indicates support for improved diagnostic consistency and augmented physician decision-making in cardiovascular care. However, the prospective cohort design does not establish causality, and follow-up duration was not reported. Clinicians should interpret these findings as preliminary evidence supporting diagnostic tool utility rather than definitive outcome improvement. Further research is needed to confirm long-term clinical impact. Additional validation in diverse populations is required before widespread implementation.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging to diagnose due to the complexity of diastolic function assessment during stress echocardiography, where multiple hemodynamic parameters must be evaluated under time pressure. Explainable artificial intelligence, specifically rule-based Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS), offers promising improvements in reproducibility and interpretability. A rule-based CDSS was developed and clinically validated to automate left ventricular diastolic function assessment during semi-supine bicycle stress echocardiography. A prospective cohort of 134 patients (mean age 61.3 ± 8.7 years) with exertional dyspnea and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF >50%) was enrolled, excluding individuals with significant valvular pathologies, arrhythmias, or unstable ischemia. Echocardiographic and Doppler data were collected using Toshiba Aplio500 and Esaote MyLabSIGMA systems. The algorithm incorporated manual input of measurements, computed derived indices (e.g., diastolic reserve index, myocardial stiffness, vascular resistance), and applied rule-based logic in accordance with ASE/EACVI (2016/2022) guidelines and the ESC HFpEF consensus. The CDSS generated diagnostic conclusions within 3 min per case, matching expert assessments in 93% of cases and correctly identifying stress-induced diastolic dysfunction in 85%. It demonstrated high diagnostic agreement (ICC > 0.94) and discrimination (AUC = 0.92). Rule-based outputs, such as “Impaired diastolic reserve” or “Right ventricular dysfunction under load,” were based on combinations of parameters (e.g., E/e′ > 15, Δe′ ≤ 0, TAPSE  12 mmHg). The explainable, guideline-compliant CDSS enables real-time, transparent analysis of diastolic function, supporting improved diagnostic consistency and augmented physician decision-making in cardiovascular care.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.