Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Registry study links ARNI therapy groups to divergent mortality and hospitalization risks in HFrEF patients.

Registry study links ARNI therapy groups to divergent mortality and hospitalization risks in HFrEF p…
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that ARNI therapy group associations with mortality and hospitalization were observed in an observational registry study.

This multicenter STRATS-HF-ARNI registry study evaluated the prognostic implications of ARNI-based therapy in 1,182 patients with HFrEF over a one-year follow-up period. The analysis focused on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and HF hospitalization as primary outcomes, stratifying patients into distinct groups based on concurrent assessment of LV and LA strain metrics.

Results indicated that Group B was associated with significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (aHR 3.53; 95% CI 1.60-7.79) and cardiovascular mortality (aHR 5.68; 95% CI 1.91-16.92) compared to Group A. Additionally, Group C demonstrated a higher risk of HF hospitalization (aHR 2.25; 95% CI 1.31-3.86) relative to Group A. The study did not report specific adverse events, discontinuations, or tolerability data.

The authors note that concurrent assessment of LV and LA strain may provide incremental prognostic value beyond LV-centric metrics alone. However, because this is an observational cohort study, the reported associations cannot be interpreted as causal. The authors caution against generalizing these findings beyond the specific registry population.

Study Details

Sample sizen = 1,182
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Aims: Assessment of treatment response in HFrEF has largely relied on left ventricular (LV)-centric parameters, yet the left atrium (LA) plays a central role in modulating LV filling and reflects the cumulative hemodynamic burden. Whether discordant recovery between LV and LA function carries distinct prognostic implications in patients treated with ARNI-based therapy remains unknown. Methods and results: From the multicenter STRATS-HF-ARNI registry, 1,182 patients with HFrEF who underwent serial echocardiography at baseline and one-year follow-up were included. Patients were classified into four strain recovery phenotypes according to the direction of change in LVGLS and LASr at one year: Group A, concordant recovery (57.4%); Group B, discordant atrial non-recovery (11.2%); Group C, discordant ventricular non-recovery (15.6%); and Group D, concordant non-recovery (16.0%). Clinical outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and HF hospitalization. Despite achieving LV functional improvement, Group B exhibited persistent LASr deterioration, accompanied by less favorable hemodynamic trajectories compared with Group A. On multivariable Cox regression, Group B was associated with significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.60-7.79) and cardiovascular mortality (aHR 5.68, 95% CI 1.91-16.92), comparable to Group D. Group C demonstrated higher HF hospitalization risk (aHR 2.25, 95% CI 1.31-3.86). The adverse prognostic impact of discordant atrial non-recovery was consistently observed across subgroups stratified by baseline LVGLS and LASr levels. Conclusion: In HFrEF patients treated with ARNI-based therapy, persistent LA dysfunction despite LV functional improvement identifies a high-risk phenotype comparable to concordant non-recovery. These findings suggest that concurrent assessment of LV and LA strain may provide incremental prognostic value beyond LV-centric metrics alone.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.