Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Low-tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass associates with higher mechanical power in patients developing postoperative pulmonary complications

Low-tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass associates with higher mechanical power i…
Photo by Europeana / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that higher mechanical power at T2 and T3 associates with PPCs in this exploratory analysis.

This prospective observational study included patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. The sample size consisted of Group 1 (n = 125) and Group 2 (n = 120). The setting was the intensive care unit. The intervention was low-tidal volume ventilation (3 mL/kg) maintained during CPB, while the comparator was ventilation discontinued after full CPB flow. Follow-up occurred 7 days postoperatively.

The primary outcome was mechanical power (MP). Mechanical power between groups did not differ significantly. Secondary outcomes assessed postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Mechanical power (MP) at T2 was higher in patients who developed PPCs (8.54 ± 0.32 vs. 7.78 ± 0.19 J/min, p = 0.041). Mechanical power (MP) at T3 was also higher in patients who developed PPCs (8.67 ± 0.33 vs. 7.82 ± 0.19 J/min, p = 0.029).

Safety data regarding tolerability and discontinuations were not reported. Serious adverse events were not reported. The study noted that the association with PPCs was exploratory. This finding was a secondary exploratory analysis. Funding or conflicts were not reported. Practice relevance was not reported.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Background and aimCardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with a high rate of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Mechanical power (MP) represents energy per breath multiplied by respiratory rate and conversion factor (0.098), resulting in J/min. This prospective observational study aimed to investigate the effects of two ventilation strategies applied during CPB on MP and their association with PPCs.MethodsIn this prospective observational study, ventilation during CPB was managed according to routine clinical practice. Ventilation was discontinued after full CPB flow in Group 1 (n = 125), while low-tidal volume ventilation (3 mL/kg) was maintained in Group 2 (n = 120). Mechanical power was measured before CPB (T1), after CPB (T2), and in the intensive care unit (T3). Patients were monitored for PPCs for 7 days postoperatively.ResultsMP, the primary endpoint of the study, did not differ significantly between the two ventilation strategy groups at any measured time point. In a secondary exploratory analysis, MP values were higher at T2 and T3 in patients who developed PPCs (T2: 8.54 ± 0.32 vs. 7.78 ± 0.19 J/min, p = 0.041; T3: 8.67 ± 0.33 vs. 7.82 ± 0.19 J/min, p = 0.029).ConclusionThe two ventilation strategies applied during CPB did not significantly affect the primary outcome, mechanical power. Higher post-CPB MP values were observed in patients who developed PPCs, although this finding was exploratory.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.