Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Covariate adjustment method for hierarchical outcomes improves statistical power in win ratio analyses

Covariate adjustment method for hierarchical outcomes improves statistical power in win ratio analys…
Photo by Clayton Robbins / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider covariate adjustment for prognostic variables in win ratio analyses of hierarchical outcomes to improve statistical efficiency.

This methodological research paper evaluated a new ordinal regression-based covariate adjustment method for the win ratio in randomized clinical trials with hierarchical composite outcomes. The approach was compared against three alternative methods (probability index models, inverse probability weighting, and a randomization-based estimator) using simulation studies and application to EMPEROR-Preserved trial data. The study did not involve a new clinical trial population or sample size.

Covariate adjustment consistently increased statistical power when adjusting for prognostic baseline variables, with gains comparable to or greater than those in conventional Cox models. The analysis found no power loss when adjusting for non-prognostic covariates. The ordinal approach performed similarly to existing methods while providing interpretable covariate effect estimates. Adjusting for baseline values of quantitative components yielded power gains according to the baseline-to-follow-up correlation.

No safety or tolerability data were reported as this was methodological research. The findings are based on simulation studies and application to one trial dataset, not results from a new clinical trial of a medical intervention. The power gains represent methodological findings from simulations, not clinical efficacy results.

For practice, the paper recommends broader adoption of covariate adjustment and the ordinal method in randomized trials using hierarchical outcomes. However, clinicians should interpret these findings as methodological improvements that require validation when applied to specific trial designs and populations. The research addresses statistical analysis methods rather than causal effects of medical interventions.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundHierarchical composite outcomes, analyzed using the win ratio, are increasingly used in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). However, methods for covariate adjustment in this context are underdeveloped, despite evidence that adjusting for prognostic variables can increase statistical power. ObjectivesIntroducing a new covariate adjustment method for hierarchical outcomes using ordinal logistic regression, comparing it with existing approaches, and assessing whether adjustment improves power in randomized trials with hierarchical outcomes. MethodsWe developed an ordinal regression-based method for covariate adjustment of the win ratio and compared it with three alternatives: probability index models, inverse probability weighting, and a randomization-based estimator. Methods were applied to the EMPEROR-Preserved rial and tested through extensive simulations involving two common hierarchical outcome structures: time-to-event composites, and composites combining time-to-event with quantitative measures. Simulations assessed impacts on estimates, standard errors, and power across prognostic and non-prognostic settings. ResultsIn RCT data and simulations, covariate adjustment consistently increased power when adjusting for prognostic baseline variables. Gains were comparable to or greater than those in conventional Cox models, with no power loss for non-prognostic covariates. Our ordinal approach performed similarly to existing methods while providing interpretable covariate effect estimates. Adjusting for baseline values of quantitative components yielded power gains according to the baseline-to-follow-up correlation. ConclusionsCovariate adjustment for prognostic variables meaningfully improves efficiency in win ratio analyses for hierarchical outcomes. Our ordinal method is easily implemented and facilitates covariate effect interpretation. We recommend the broader adoption of covariate adjustment and our ordinal method in randomized trials using hierarchical outcomes.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.