Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds colchicine associated with reduced MACE in ASCVD, but heterogeneity is substantial

Meta-analysis finds colchicine associated with reduced MACE in ASCVD, but heterogeneity is substanti…
Photo by Ian Talmacs / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider colchicine's MACE benefit in ASCVD exploratory; heterogeneity is substantial and findings need confirmation.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined 5 randomized controlled trials involving 18,656 adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The analysis compared low-dose colchicine to placebo or no treatment, with the primary outcome being 4-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The DerSimonian-Laird pooled hazard ratio for MACE was 0.68 (95% CI 0.51-0.89, p=0.0060), suggesting an association with reduced events. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman-adjusted analysis showed the same HR of 0.68 but with a non-significant p-value of 0.3018 and a much wider confidence interval (95% CI 0.27-1.70). Non-cardiovascular mortality showed no significant difference (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.76-1.50, p=0.6937). Regarding safety, gastrointestinal drug discontinuation was significantly higher with colchicine (RR 1.95), though other adverse events were not reported. Key limitations include substantial statistical heterogeneity (I²=81.4%), a 95% prediction interval that crosses 1.0 (0.29-1.57), and a small pool of only 5 trials. The exploratory trial-level meta-regression suggesting benefit may be more consistent with sub-acute or chronic initiation rather than hyper-acute post-PCI initiation should be considered hypothesis-generating. In practice, while the DerSimonian-Laird analysis shows a significant association, the substantial heterogeneity and non-significant HKSJ result indicate the effect size likely varies considerably across different clinical settings. These findings are exploratory and require confirmation in larger, more homogeneous patient populations.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 18,656
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundDespite optimal lipid-lowering and antithrombotic therapy, substantial residual cardiovascular risk persists in established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), partly driven by chronic vascular inflammation through the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway. In an open-label pilot using colchicine 0.5 mg twice daily, hsCRP was reduced by approximately 60%. However, landmark trials report divergent results, most notably the null CLEAR SYNERGY trial (HR 0.99) versus the positive LoDoCo2 (HR 0.69) and COLCOT (HR 0.77), generating controversy about the role of timing and cumulative exposure. MethodsSystematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing colchicine to placebo or no treatment in adults with established ASCVD. Searches on March 21, 2026 (PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP) identified 1,315 records; 5 trials (N=18,656) were included. Primary outcome: 4-point MACE. Random-effects pooling used DerSimonian-Laird (DL) estimation; Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ)-adjusted analysis and a 95% prediction interval were computed as pre-specified methodological sensitivity analyses. Trial-level meta-regression tested time-to-initiation (TTI) and cumulative dose as exploratory moderators. PROSPERO CRD420261346516. ResultsDL pooled HR for 4-point MACE: 0.68 (95% CI 0.51-0.89; p=0.0060). HKSJ-adjusted HR: 0.68 (95% CI 0.27-1.70; p=0.3018). Substantial heterogeneity (I2=81.4%; 95% prediction interval 0.29-1.57, crossing 1.0). Exploratory trial-level meta-regression identified TTI as a significant moderator ({beta}=-0.00187/day; p=0.003) and cumulative dose as an independent moderator ({beta}=-0.00163/mg-day; p=0.0003); these associations are hypothesis-generating given k=5 trials. Non-cardiovascular mortality was not significantly increased (HR 1.07; 0.76-1.50; p=0.6937). GI drug discontinuation was significantly higher with colchicine (RR 1.95; 1.09- 3.48; p=0.0236). ConclusionsLow-dose colchicine is associated with reduced 4-point MACE in ASCVD (DL HR 0.68; HKSJ HR 0.68). The substantial heterogeneity and wide prediction interval indicate that effect size varies substantially across settings. Trial-level associations suggest benefit is more consistent with sub-acute or chronic initiation and sustained exposure, while hyper-acute post-PCI initiation does not show benefit. The non-CV mortality safety concern is not confirmed. These findings are exploratory given the small trial pool and should be interpreted with appropriate caution pending larger synthesis.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.