Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

TTE-guided leadless pacemaker implantation shows feasibility and comparable duration to fluoroscopy in small cohort

TTE-guided leadless pacemaker implantation shows feasibility and comparable duration to fluoroscopy …
Photo by Aakash Dhage / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider TTE-guided leadless pacing as a radiation-free option in select patients, pending validation of long-term outcomes.

This was a prospectively protocolized single-arm cohort study with retrospective comparative analysis against a historical control group. It evaluated completely transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)-guided leadless pacemaker implantation assisted by the ultrasound-optimized Panna guidewire in 10 eligible patients, compared to 44 historical patients who underwent standard fluoroscopy-guided implantation. The primary outcome was not explicitly reported; secondary outcomes included procedural feasibility, short-term safety, pacing parameters, and procedural duration.

All 10 patients in the TTE-guided cohort had optimal (Grade 1) acoustic windows. Procedural success was achieved in 10/10 patients (100%). The skin-to-skin procedural duration was comparable between groups: 62.78 ± 13.05 minutes for TTE-guided versus 60.5 ± 19.1 minutes for fluoroscopy-guided (P > 0.05). The study reported no adverse events and stable device performance during a median follow-up of 4.7 months, with long-term follow-up (12/24 months) ongoing.

Key limitations include the small sample size of 10 patients, incomplete long-term follow-up, and the study's design as a hypothesis-generating proof-of-concept. The findings are preliminary and require validation in larger multicenter registries (n ≥ 50) with ≥24-month follow-up. The practice relevance centers on the potential to eliminate radiation and contrast-related risks for high-risk patients (e.g., those with chronic kidney disease or radiation sensitivity) while matching the procedural efficiency of fluoroscopy-guided implantation, though generalizability is not yet confirmed.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Background and objectiveConventional leadless pacemaker (LP) implantation relies on fluoroscopy, exposing patients and operators to ionizing radiation and contrast-related risks. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a radiation-free alternative, but complete TTE-guided LP implantation remains challenging due to poor ultrasound visibility of interventional devices. This study evaluated the short-term safety, technical feasibility, and procedural efficiency of completely TTE-guided LP implantation assisted by the ultrasound-optimized Panna guidewire.MethodsThis study utilized a prospectively protocolized, single-arm design for the TTE-guided cohort, with a retrospective comparative analysis against a historical fluoroscopy-guided control group. All safety and efficacy endpoints were formally predefined prior to patient enrollment. A total of 32 consecutive patients with LP implantation indications were screened during the study period (July 2024–July 2025), and 10 eligible patients underwent fluoroscopy/contrast-free, TTE-guided LP implantation using the Panna guidewire. Preoperative TTE acoustic window grading was performed, and standardized protocols (semi-quantitative “gooseneck” sign assessment, TTE-guided tug test) were applied during the procedure. A historical control group of 44 fluoroscopy-guided LP patients (January 2020–December 2023) was included, with propensity score overlap weighting-based comparative statistical analyses performed to balance baseline covariates and assess between-group differences. Procedural feasibility, short-term safety, pacing parameters, and skin-to-skin procedural duration were evaluated intraoperatively and during follow-up.ResultsAll 10 patients had optimal TTE acoustic windows (Grade 1). Procedural success was 100%, with no adverse events (median follow-up: 4.7 months) and stable device performance. Sensitivity analysis showed the TTE technique's effectiveness was not affected by operator experience. Compared with 44 propensity score-weighted controls, TTE-guided implantation had slightly longer but comparable procedural duration (62.78 ± 13.05 vs. 60.5 ± 19.1 min, P > 0.05) and comparable efficiency, eliminating radiation/contrast-related risks for high-risk patients (e.g., CKD, radiation sensitivity). Long-term follow-up (12/24 months) is ongoing per schedule.ConclusionsThis preliminary experience demonstrates the short-term safety and technical feasibility of completely TTE-guided LP implantation assisted by the Panna guidewire, which eliminates radiation/contrast risks while matching fluoroscopy-guided efficiency. As a hypothesis-generating proof-of-concept study (small sample, incomplete long-term follow-up), these findings require validation in larger multicenter registries (n ≥ 50) with ≥24-month follow-up to confirm long-term safety and generalizability.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.