A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluated the EVOQUE transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement system plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in patients with symptomatic, severe tricuspid regurgitation. The study enrolled 400 patients, with 267 receiving TTVR and 133 serving as controls, and followed them for 12 to 18 months.
The primary endpoint, a win ratio combining safety and effectiveness, favored TTVR over control for both severe and massive/torrential tricuspid regurgitation, with effect sizes of 1.64 and 2.20, respectively. At one year, over 95% of patients in both groups achieved mild or less tricuspid regurgitation, indicating significant valve improvement.
All-cause mortality rates were similar between groups at 18 months, with no significant differences. However, heart failure hospitalizations were significantly reduced in the massive/torrential group with TTVR, showing a favorable rate difference of -15.2%.
Limitations include post-hoc analyses and incomplete reporting of absolute numbers and p-values for some outcomes. The findings support TTVR as a beneficial intervention for severe tricuspid regurgitation, particularly in advanced disease, though longer-term data are needed.
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The TRISCEND II trial demonstrated superior clinical benefits for patients with ≥severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) treated with the EVOQUE transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) system plus medical therapy vs medical therapy alone. This work reports 1-year and 18-month outcomes in patients stratified by baseline TR severity.
METHODS: The multicentre, prospective TRISCEND II trial enrolled 400 patients with symptomatic, ≥severe TR, and randomized 2:1 to TTVR (n = 267) or control (n = 133). In a post hoc analysis, patients were stratified into severe TR (n = 172) and massive/torrential TR (n = 220) cohorts. Clinical and quality-of-life outcomes were reported at 1 year, with Kaplan-Meier estimates for all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization assessed at 18 months. Study oversight included an independent echocardiographic core laboratory, clinical events committee, and data safety monitoring board.
RESULTS: One year after TTVR, TR was ≤mild in 95.2% of severe TR and 95.3% of massive/torrential TR patients. The primary safety and effectiveness endpoint (win ratio) favoured TTVR over control regardless of baseline TR severity: severe {1.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11, 2.43]} and massive/torrential [2.20 (1.55, 3.14)]. At 18 months, TTVR patients had similar mortality to controls [rate difference: severe 0.2% (-11.6, 11.9), massive/torrential -5.8% (-17.6, 6.0)], whereas HF hospitalization rates favoured TTVR in the massive/torrential cohort [vs control, severe 9.8% (-3.0, 22.7), massive/torrential -15.2% (-28.9, -1.5)].
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ≥severe TR benefit from TTVR, experiencing improvements in TR severity, functional capacity, and quality of life regardless of baseline TR severity, with a signal for greater benefit in patients with more advanced disease.