Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Motivation-informed digital reminders do not improve task completion compared to standard wording in melanoma trialStandard Digital Reminders Work Well for Melanoma Monitoring Tasks

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that motivation-informed wording did not improve task completion compared to standard reminders in melanoma trials.

This randomized study within a trial (SWAT) enrolled 260 participants in a melanoma surveillance trial (MEL-SELF). The study evaluated the effect of motivation-informed digital reminders compared to standard digital reminders on participant compliance with trial tasks.

Regarding primary outcomes, both reminder types resulted in an 82% rate for on-time completion of the first diary (106/130 in both arms; Risk Difference: 0.0%; 95% CI, -9.5% to 9.5%). For the first submission of images, the motivation-informed group had a lower rate of 51% compared to 57% for standard reminders (Risk Difference: -6.3%; 95% CI, -22.9% to 10.6%).

Secondary outcomes showed that any-time completion of scheduled image submissions was 50% in the motivation-informed group versus 67% in the standard group. No safety data or specific adverse events were reported.

Clinical relevance is limited because changing message content alone did not improve task completion for either diaries or images. For high-complexity tasks, logistical barriers may outweigh the impact of motivational wording.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This study addresses a gap in patient engagement strategies within melanoma surveillance trials. While other covered items focus on treatment outcomes such as IO102-IO103 plus pembrolizumab for progression-free survival, TIL therapy and engineered viral vector immunotherapies for response rates, or the role of mitochondrial transfer in progression, this study specifically evaluates the efficacy of behavioral interventions to improve trial compliance. It confirms that motivation-informed messaging does not overcome logistical barriers in melanoma monitoring.

Researchers conducted a study to see if changing the wording of digital reminders could help people with melanoma stay on track with their health monitoring. They compared two types of messages: one based on motivation and one that was standard. The study included 260 participants who were part of a melanoma surveillance trial.

The results showed no difference between the two types of reminders for completing initial diaries. However, when it came to submitting images, the standard reminders actually had higher completion rates than the motivation-informed ones. Specifically, 57% of people using standard reminders submitted their first image on time compared to 51% in the other group.

The study suggests that for simple tasks like keeping a diary, the wording of a notification might not matter much. For more complex tasks, such as taking and uploading photos, simply changing the words in a text message is unlikely to overcome the effort required by the patient. Patients should talk to their doctors about the best ways to manage their monitoring schedules.

What this means for you:
Standard digital reminders are effective for melanoma tracking; special wording does not significantly improve results.

Common questions

Do special motivational messages help more with tracking tasks?

The study found no difference between motivation-informed reminders and standard reminders for completing the first diary. Both groups had an 82% completion rate for their initial diaries. This suggests that simple, standard wording is sufficient for basic monitoring tasks.

How did patients perform when submitting images?

Patients using standard reminders were more likely to submit their first image on time compared to those receiving motivation-informed messages. In the study, 57% of the standard group submitted on time, while 51% of the motivation-informed group did so.

Why didn't the special wording improve results for complex tasks?

The researchers noted that for high-complexity tasks, changing the message content alone is unlikely to overcome logistical barriers or the effort required by the patient. For these tasks, standard reminders may be just as effective as specialized ones.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 130
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up3.0 mo
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVES: Digital reminders are widely used in clinical trials, but their design is rarely evidence-based. We evaluated the effectiveness of two types of digital reminders for trial task completion. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: This randomized Study Within A Trial (SWAT) was embedded in the MEL-SELF trial which evaluates patient-led vs. clinician-led melanoma surveillance. SWAT participants were randomized 1:1 to motivation-informed or standard digital reminders for two tasks: monthly health-resource diaries (all participants) and 3-monthly image submissions of self-detected skin lesions (MEL-SELF intervention arm only). Primary outcomes were the per-participant proportion of diaries completed on time (within 14 days) and images completed on time (42 days). Secondary outcomes were on-time completion of the first diary and first scheduled image, any-time completion, time to completion, number of reminders required, and costs. RESULTS: Between 16 August 2023 and 3 June 2024, 260 participants were randomized to motivation-informed (n = 130) or standard (n = 130) reminders. On-time completion of the first diary was 82% (106/130) for both reminder types (risk difference (RD): 0.0%; 95% CI, -9.5% to 9.5%) and any-time per-participant diary completion was also high (median 100% both arms). Across 2821 diary submission tasks, participants received 5710 automated reminders (mean 2.0 per task), with 21.6% requiring staff follow-up; mean cost per completed diary was AUD 4.15 (Australian dollars). For images, on-time first submission was 51% (33/65) in the motivation-informed arm and 57% (36/63) in the standard arm (RD: -6.3%; 95% CI, -22.9% to 10.6%); per-participant any-time completion of scheduled image submissions was also modest in both arms (median 50% motivation-informed vs 67% standard). For 489 image episodes, there were 1929 automated reminders (mean 3.9 per episode); 56.0% required trial staff follow-up, and the mean cost per submitted image was AUD 17.43. In prespecified subgroups, differences between reminder arms were small, with diary completion higher in both SWAT arms for participants in the MEL-SELF control arm compared with the intervention arm. CONCLUSION: Motivation-informed reminders did not improve completion of trial tasks compared with standard wording. For low-complexity tasks, standard reminders may be sufficient; for high-complexity tasks, changing message content alone is unlikely to offset burden or logistical barriers. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Clinical trials often rely on participants to complete tasks such as filling in online diaries or submitting information at scheduled time points. Missing tasks can reduce the quality of trial data. Many trials use digital reminders to help people complete these tasks, but we do not know whether certain types of reminder messages work better than others. In this study, we tested whether reminders written to reflect people's motivations for joining a trial would improve task completion compared with standard reminders. We embedded this research into a melanoma surveillance trial. Participants received monthly reminders to complete online health diaries, and some also received reminders every 3 months to submit skin images. We compared motivation-informed reminders with standard reminders, and we measured how often participants completed these tasks on time, as well as the amount of staff time needed to support completion. We found that motivation-informed reminders did not increase task completion. Almost all participants completed their online diaries, regardless of the reminder wording. Image submissions were more challenging: only about half of participants completed them on time, and many required additional help from trial staff. These findings show that changing reminder message content did not meaningfully improve task completion. For simple tasks, standard reminders appear sufficient. For more complex tasks, improving the process itself (e.g., making image capture easier or providing more hands-on support) may be more important than changing the message wording.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.