This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the Neck Circumference, Obesity, Snoring, Age, and Sex (NoSAS) score for detecting obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The analysis included 31 studies conducted in sleep-related clinics and community-based settings involving patients with mild, moderate, and severe OSA. The NoSAS score was compared against polysomnography or other validated references.
The primary outcome measured the sensitivity and specificity of the NoSAS score across different OSA severities. For mild OSA, sensitivity was 71% and specificity was 66%. Sensitivity for moderate OSA was 73% with a specificity of 62%. For severe OSA, sensitivity increased to 82%, while specificity decreased to 50%.
Secondary analyses explored associations between BMI, sample size, age, country, and setting with diagnostic performance metrics. Safety data, adverse events, and tolerability were not reported in the included studies. A key limitation identified was a high degree of heterogeneity across the studies, which impacts the consistency of the results.
Despite heterogeneity, the NoSAS score performed consistently across OSA severities. This suggests potential utility in resource-limited settings where polysomnography is unavailable. Clinicians should consider these results as preliminary and interpret them with caution given the variability in study designs and populations.
View Original Abstract ↓
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent yet underdiagnosed condition. Although the Neck Circumference, Obesity, Snoring, Age, and Sex (NoSAS) score is commonly used in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the NoSAS score in detecting mild, moderate, and severe OSA, based on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) or respiratory event index (REI). PubMed, Embase, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I, Ovid Medline, CINAHL Plus, and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles published before August 29, 2025. We included studies evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the NoSAS score compared with polysomnography or other validated references. A bivariate random-effects model was used for data analysis. Our meta-analysis included 31 studies, 25 on mild or AHI/REI ≥5 events/h, 31 on moderate or AHI/REI ≥15 events/h, and 24 on severe or AHI/REI ≥30 events/h. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 71% and 66% for mild OSA, 73% and 62% for moderate OSA, and 82% and 50% for severe OSA, respectively. Moderator analysis revealed an association between BMI and higher sensitivity for mild and severe OSA. Larger sample sizes were associated with higher specificity for mild OSA. Advanced age was associated with pooled specificity in severe OSA. Caucasian countries increased sensitivity in all OSA severity and increased specificity in severe OSA compared to Asian countries. Sleep-related clinic has higher specificity in both of moderate and severe OSA and increased sensitivity in moderate OSA (all p < 0.05) compared to community-based settings. We suggest that the NoSAS score performed consistently across OSA severities, making it useful in resource-limited settings. Nevertheless, our findings should be interpreted with caution due to the high degree of heterogeneity.