When you're trying to manage your weight, what's a good goal to aim for? A new analysis looked at whether hitting specific targets—like a waist-to-height ratio under 0.53 or a BMI under 27—might be linked to feeling better. The data came from people with obesity in the SURMOUNT-5 trial who were taking either tirzepatide or semaglutide. The analysis found that between 23% and 34% of people on tirzepatide reached at least one of these thresholds, compared to 14% to 21% of those on semaglutide. More importantly, people who got their waist-to-height ratio under 0.53 had more than double the odds of also reaching a state of low disease activity or remission. However, hitting the BMI target wasn't linked to improvements in a physical health quality-of-life score. It's crucial to remember this was a 'post hoc' analysis—meaning researchers looked back at the data after the main trial was done, rather than planning to test these specific targets from the start. This makes the findings more of an interesting observation than a firm conclusion. The results don't prove that reaching these targets causes better health; they only show an association. The idea is that having clear, measurable targets could help doctors and patients have better conversations about treatment goals.
Post hoc analysis links WHtR threshold to remission in obesity management with tirzepatide vs semaglutideCould hitting specific weight targets help people feel better?
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
This was a post hoc analysis of the SURMOUNT-5 randomized controlled trial, examining participants with obesity. The analysis applied proposed treat-to-target thresholds (WHtR <0.53, BMI <27 kg/m², or a combination) to outcomes in participants randomized to tirzepatide or semaglutide over 72 weeks. The primary outcome was not reported for this specific analysis.
Regarding the main results, 23.1% to 33.9% of tirzepatide participants and 14.2% to 20.7% of semaglutide participants reached the proposed thresholds. Reaching the WHtR <0.53 threshold was associated with achieving low disease activity to remission, with 77% of those who reached the threshold achieving this outcome and an odds ratio of 2.31 (p < 0.001). The BMI threshold was not statistically associated with normalization or improvement in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported for this specific analysis. A key limitation is that this was a post hoc analysis, not a prespecified endpoint of the original trial. The analysis suggests treat-to-target thresholds may help clarify goals in shared decision-making, but the findings are exploratory. Causation between reaching thresholds and improved outcomes is not established, and generalizability beyond the SURMOUNT-5 population is uncertain.