This pilot randomized controlled trial enrolled 129 postmenopausal women with Type 2 Diabetes for more than 5 years and high fracture risk at a single tertiary care center in India. Participants received Zoledronate 5 mg annually, Denosumab 60 mg every 6 months, or Teriparatide 20 µg daily compared to standard of care with calcium and cholecalciferol. The study design utilized randomization to assign treatment groups for comparison against the control arm.
Primary outcomes assessed bone microarchitecture via HR-pQCT at 24 weeks. Teriparatide significantly improved total and trabecular vBMD, Tb.N, BV/TV, and Tb.Th. Denosumab improved tibial trabecular vBMD and Tb.N, while Zoledronate improved only tibial total vBMD. Microfinite element analysis showed unchanged strength parameters except for a modest increase in tibial stiffness with denosumab. Secondary outcomes included bone turnover markers and strength parameters derived from microfinite element analysis.
Bone turnover markers decreased with antiresorptives and increased with teriparatide, showing an anabolic window by 6 weeks. Safety data regarding adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuations were not reported. Limitations include the pilot trial design and interim analysis status. Larger, adequately powered studies are needed to confirm these findings before widespread clinical adoption. The trial duration is 72 weeks, but results presented are from the 24 weeks interim analysis.
View Original Abstract ↓
CONTEXT: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) increases fragility fracture risk despite normal/elevated areal bone mineral density (aBMD), attributed to compromised bone microarchitecture. However, evidence guiding pharmacologic management of diabetic bone disease remains limited.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate interim effects of zoledronate, denosumab, or teriparatide on bone microarchitecture in postmenopausal women with T2D at high fracture risk.
METHODS: A 72-week, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) pilot clinical trial (CTRI/2022/02/039978) was conducted at a single tertiary care center in India. Participants included 129 postmenopausal women with T2D for more than 5 years and high fracture risk (prior fragility fracture and/or T-score < -2.5 [corrected for T2D] with elevated FRAX®). Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive zoledronate 5 mg annually, denosumab 60 mg every 6 months, teriparatide 20 µg daily, or only standard of care (calcium/cholecalciferol) for 72 weeks. The outcome measure included a prespecified 24-week interim exploratory analysis focusing on changes in bone microarchitecture assessed by second-generation high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) at the distal tibia and radius. Bone turnover markers (BTMs) were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Baseline demographic, biochemical, aBMD, and HR-pQCT parameters were comparable across groups. Teriparatide significantly improved total and trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD) (at tibia and radius), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) (at tibia), and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) (at radius). Denosumab improved tibial trabecular vBMD and Tb.N. Zoledronate improved only tibial total vBMD. Microfinite element analysis-derived strength parameters were unchanged, except for a modest increase in tibial stiffness with denosumab. BTMs decreased with antiresorptives, increased with teriparatide, and showed an anabolic window by 6 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Teriparatide demonstrated early improvements in bone microarchitecture in postmenopausal women with T2D while denosumab showed a modest increase in bone stiffness at the distal tibia. Larger, adequately powered studies are needed to clarify the relative effects of anabolic and antiresorptive therapies in this population.