Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Retrospective analysis of 2,118 necropsies in Southern Germany identifies infectious diseases as the leading cause of wild mammal deathWildlife Deaths in Germany Reveal Hidden Human Impact

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that infectious diseases are the leading cause of death in Southern German wild mammals based on 2,118 necropsies.

This retrospective multicenter analysis examined 2,118 complete necropsy reports of wild mammals collected in Southern Germany from 2019 through 2023. The study aimed to determine the primary causes of death within this population. Infectious diseases emerged as the leading cause of death overall. Trauma was identified as the second most common cause of death. Road traffic collisions were the predominant factor contributing to trauma-related mortality.

The analysis revealed specific disease patterns across different species. European hares were affected by tularemia and European brown hare syndrome, while European rabbits were affected by rabbit hemorrhagic disease. Canine distemper virus was a major infectious cause of death specifically in red foxes. A seasonal mortality peak was observed during the spring period. This peak was most pronounced among the adult demographic.

The study notes that regionally structured evaluations in Central Europe remain scarce, which represents a key limitation. These findings are relevant for informing conservation planning, wildlife management, and public health risk assessment. The data provides a snapshot of mortality drivers in this specific geographic region during the study period.

Why a dead fox matters to you

Imagine walking through a quiet forest in southern Germany. You spot a fox lying still by the roadside. It’s a sad sight, but it’s also a clue. That animal’s death tells a story about the health of the entire ecosystem—and about the pressures humans put on nature.

A new study analyzing over 2,000 dead wild mammals from 2019 to 2023 reveals exactly what is killing these animals. And the results point directly back to us.

What’s killing local wildlife?

Wild mammals are like the canaries in the coal mine for our environment. When they get sick or die in large numbers, it signals problems that can affect everything from soil health to human disease risk.

In southern Germany, veterinarians perform necropsies—animal autopsies—on wild animals found dead. These reports are a goldmine of information. But until now, no one had systematically analyzed all the data from the region’s public veterinary labs.

This study fills that gap. It looked at 2,118 complete necropsy reports from across southern Germany. The goal was simple: find out what’s killing our wild neighbors and how it’s changing.

Old guesses vs. hard data

For years, people assumed that natural causes like old age or starvation were the main drivers of wildlife death. But this study, published in Frontiers in Medicine, uses hard data to paint a different picture.

The researchers categorized every death by species, age, sex, season, and cause. They even used a global medical coding system (ICD-11) to make the data comparable worldwide.

Here’s the twist: the top killers aren’t natural at all.

A traffic jam of causes

Think of the ecosystem as a busy highway. When humans build roads, introduce diseases, or change habitats, it’s like causing a massive traffic jam. Animals get caught in the chaos.

The study found that infectious diseases are the number one cause of death. But these aren’t random illnesses. They are often tied to human activity.

For example, canine distemper virus is a major killer of red foxes, and it clusters in specific regions. Tularemia and European brown hare syndrome are devastating European hares. These diseases can spill over from domestic animals or altered habitats.

But the second biggest cause of death is even more direct: trauma from road traffic collisions.

The spring surge

The data also revealed a clear seasonal pattern. Mortality peaks in spring, especially among adult animals. This is likely when animals are more active, moving across landscapes that are increasingly fragmented by roads and development.

The most frequently examined species were European hares, red foxes, roe deer, and wild boar. Each faced unique threats, but all were touched by human influence.

Out of 2,118 animals, infectious diseases and trauma accounted for the vast majority of deaths. For red foxes, canine distemper was a dominant force. For hares, specific viral diseases were rampant.

The study didn’t just list causes—it showed patterns. For instance, roadkill wasn’t random; it followed major traffic routes. Disease outbreaks clustered in areas with high human or livestock density.

This isn’t just about individual animals dying. It’s about population-level impacts that can ripple through the food chain.

But here’s the catch

This study is a snapshot of the past. It tells us what happened between 2019 and 2023, but it doesn’t predict the future. Climate change, new diseases, or changes in land use could shift these patterns quickly.

This doesn’t mean the problem is solved.

A new tool for wildlife health

Experts say this research is a breakthrough for wildlife management. By using the ICD-11 coding system, veterinarians and scientists can now compare data across borders. This is crucial for tracking diseases that don’t respect national lines.

One Health—the idea that human, animal, and environmental health are linked—is at the core of this work. When a fox dies from a road accident or a disease, it’s not just a wildlife issue. It’s a public health and conservation issue.

If you live in southern Germany, this research confirms what many locals suspect: our roads and cities are reshaping wildlife populations. It doesn’t mean you should stop hiking or enjoying nature. Instead, it’s a reminder to drive carefully in wildlife areas and support local conservation efforts.

This study isn’t about a new treatment or cure. It’s about understanding the problem better so we can fix it.

The research relied on necropsy reports, which only include animals that were found and reported. Many dead animals are never discovered, so the true death toll could be higher. Also, the data is from one region of Germany, so results may not apply everywhere.

Next, researchers hope to expand this analysis to all of Germany and even Europe. Long-term, the goal is to use this data to guide wildlife corridors, reduce roadkill, and control disease outbreaks.

For now, this study gives us a clear, data-driven look at the hidden costs of human activity on wildlife. And that’s the first step toward making things better.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Wild mammals are important indicators of ecosystem health, zoonotic risks, and anthropogenic pressures. Systematic necropsies provide valuable insights into mortality patterns, yet regionally structured evaluations in Central Europe remain scarce. A total of 2,118 complete necropsy reports of wild mammals submitted to public veterinary investigation authorities in southern Germany between 2019 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Data were categorized according to species, age, sex, season, and cause of death. Mortality causes were classified using the WHO ICD-11 system to enable standardized reporting and international comparability. The most frequently examined species were European hare (Lepus europaeus), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa). Infectious diseases were the leading cause of death, with tularemia and European brown hare syndrome predominantly affecting European hares, rabbit hemorrhagic disease occurring mainly in European rabbits and canine distemper virus representing the major infectious cause of death in red foxes, often showing distinct regional clustering. Trauma was the second most common cause of death, with road traffic collisions as the predominant factor. A pronounced seasonal mortality peak was observed in spring, particularly among adults. The present study highlights the multifactorial nature of wildlife mortality in southern Germany, with anthropogenic drivers playing a central role. It represents the first comprehensive regional overview of wildlife mortality in Germany based on complete necropsy datasets from all public veterinary investigation authorities in southern Germany. The ICD-11 classification proved useful for structuring mortality data and supports international comparability. These findings underline the value of necropsy-based surveillance as an important tool in One Health, informing conservation planning, wildlife management and public health risk assessment.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.