Barriers and promoters to CGM and AID use in youth with T1D and public insurance
This prospective, mixed-methods study focused on youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who have public insurance. The investigation assessed barriers and promoters to the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and artificial insulin delivery (AID). The primary outcome measured was diabetes technology acceptance. No specific sample size, setting, or follow-up duration were reported in the available data.
The study did not report specific numerical results for technology acceptance rates, nor did it provide data on adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or general tolerability. Consequently, no specific percentages or p-values can be cited regarding the main findings or safety profile.
Key limitations include the lack of reported sample size, setting details, and follow-up duration. The study did not report funding sources or conflicts of interest. Causality was not reported, and the evidence certainty was not explicitly defined.
Practice relevance suggests that interventions effective in increasing the uptake and continued use of diabetes technology in youth with T1D and public insurance are necessary to mitigate disparities. Clinicians should recognize the need for such interventions without overstating the specific efficacy data provided by this study.