Narrative review advocates multi-omics models to clarify exercise associations
This narrative review examines the complex relationship between exercise and health outcomes. The authors highlight that significant knowledge gaps exist in the current literature. They state that direct causation in exercise remains associative rather than proven. Emerging evidence from non-exercise models like Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination and β-glucan exposure suggests parallels to exercise effects. However, the authors emphasize that these parallels do not confirm direct causation for physical activity.
The authors advocate for the use of multi-omics and in vivo models to fully elucidate this complex nexus. They argue that these advanced methods are necessary to understand the underlying mechanisms. The review suggests that translating these discoveries into novel therapeutic strategies is a key future goal. This approach aims to bridge the gap between current observational data and mechanistic understanding.
The review concludes that practice relevance depends on addressing current limitations. It notes that emerging evidence from non-exercise models suggests parallels but direct causation in exercise remains associative. Clinicians should interpret these findings with caution given the existing knowledge gaps. The authors recommend further research using advanced modeling to clarify these associations.