Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

ADRB1 and ADRB2 antihypertensive target perturbations associated with increased clear cell renal cell carcinoma risk

ADRB1 and ADRB2 antihypertensive target perturbations associated with increased clear cell renal…
Photo by Google DeepMind / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that genetic proxies for ADRB1 and ADRB2 antihypertensive targets show an association with increased clear cell renal cell carcinoma risk.

This is a meta-analysis of summary-data-based Mendelian randomization and colocalization analyses, supplemented by Western blotting and prognostic analyses, focusing on antihypertensive drug targets in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). The scope was to evaluate genetic perturbations equivalent to 1 SD unit of decreased blood pressure for targets ACE, ADRB1, ADRB2, and SLC12A3 using data from two large GWAS databases.

The key synthesized finding is that ADRB1 perturbation was associated with CCRCC risk in both discovery and validation cohorts, with an integrated odds ratio of 1.100 (95% CI 1.066–1.135; P-value 0.016 discovery, 0.013 validation). ADRB2 perturbation was associated with CCRCC risk in the discovery cohort only, with an odds ratio of 1.224 (95% CI 1.045–1.433; P-value 0.019).

The authors note limitations, including the observational nature of genetic associations and the lack of reported follow-up or safety data. No practice relevance was reported. The findings suggest a potential link between these antihypertensive targets and kidney cancer risk, but causality remains uncertain.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundAntihypertensive drug targets are associated with various cancers, but their relationship with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) risk remains unclear.MethodsSummary-data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) and colocalization analyses were performed. Four antihypertensive drug targets (ACE, ADRB1, ADRB2, and SLC12A3) and CCRCC were included. Patients with CCRCC were identified from two large GWAS databases, including 752,817 and 315,137 individuals (Finnish cohorts), for the discovery and external validation analyses, respectively. Meta-analysis was conducted to integrate the results from both cohorts. Western blotting and prognostic analyses of tumor survival revealed the relationship between ADRB1 and CCRCC.ResultsADRB1 was associated with CCRCC risk in both the discovery and validation cohorts (odds ratio (OR): 1.097, per standard deviation unit (SD) change in antihypertensive drug target perturbation equivalent to 1 SD unit of decreased blood pressure; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.063–1.132; P-value = 0.016) vs. OR: 1.284; 95% CI: 1.014–1.627; P-value = 0.013). ADRB2 was associated with CCRCC risk in discovery cohort (OR: 1.224; 95% CI: 1.045–1.433; P-value = 0.019). Integrated outcomes demonstrated that both ADRB1 (OR: 1.100; 95% CI: 1.066–1.135; P-value
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.