Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Combined TCM and conventional medicine therapies show higher overall effectiveness than monotherapy in ulcerative colitisCombined therapies show higher effectiveness for ulcerative colitis patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider combined TCM and conventional medicine for higher overall efficacy in ulcerative colitis compared to monotherapy.

This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated 46 randomized controlled trials involving 3,763 patients with ulcerative colitis to compare Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Conventional Medicine (CM), and integrated TCM-CM therapies. The analysis focused on total effective rates, clinical symptoms like diarrhea and abdominal pain, inflammatory markers including IL-8, CRP, and ESR, and cytokine regulation.

The authors synthesized that combination therapies, specifically CM combined with TCMD and acupoint catgut embedding, achieved the highest total effective rate compared to monotherapy. However, for specific outcomes such as alleviating diarrhea and abdominal pain or reducing inflammatory markers like IL-8, CRP, and ESR, CM alone was ranked highest. Specific combinations showed superiority in cytokine regulation: CM plus TCMD and acupuncture were best for IL-6 reduction, while CM plus TCMD was superior for IL-10 improvement.

Several limitations were noted, including insufficient evidence regarding clinical score improvements and endoscopic mucosal healing. The authors emphasize that more high-quality clinical evidence is required to confirm the definite efficacy of TCM components. Clinical practice may involve selecting optimal regimens based on individual patient conditions, noting that combination therapy shows greater overall efficacy than CM alone.

How this fits prior evidence

This finding addresses a gap in identifying specific integrated treatment pathways for ulcerative colitis. While prior coverage noted that mucus-barrier regulatory programs involving ER stress and microbial sensing are linked to inflammatory remodeling, this meta-analysis provides evidence on the comparative efficacy of combining TCM with conventional medicine. It builds upon existing knowledge by suggesting that while CM is superior for specific symptoms and markers, combination therapies may offer higher overall effectiveness in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Living with ulcerative colitis means dealing with persistent inflammation and uncomfortable symptoms like abdominal pain and diarrhea. While standard medical treatments are the mainstay of care, a large review of 46 clinical trials involving over 3,700 patients looked at whether adding traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) could improve outcomes.

The analysis found that combining conventional medicine with specific TCM techniques, such as acupoint catgut embedding and TCMD, resulted in the highest overall effectiveness rates. However, the results were nuanced. For specific issues like reducing inflammatory markers or managing immediate symptoms like diarrhea, conventional medicine alone performed best.

Different combinations also showed different strengths. For example, a triple combination of medicine, TCMD, and acupuncture was most effective at reducing IL-6 levels, while a dual combination of medicine and TCMD helped with IL-10. Because evidence is still limited regarding long-term healing and specific clinical scores, doctors can use these findings to tailor treatments based on a patient's unique needs.

What this means for you:
Combining traditional Chinese medicine with standard care shows higher overall effectiveness for ulcerative colitis.

Common questions

Is it more effective to use combined treatments?

The study found that combination therapies, such as using conventional medicine with TCMD and acupoint catgut embedding, had the highest total effective rate compared to using conventional medicine alone.

Which treatment is best for specific symptoms like diarrhea?

For specific symptoms like abdominal pain and diarrhea, as well as reducing inflammatory markers like CRP and ESR, conventional medicine alone ranked highest in the study's results.

What are the limitations of these findings?

There is currently insufficient evidence to determine if these treatments improve clinical scores or lead to endoscopic mucosal healing. More high-quality evidence is needed to confirm the specific effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicine.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectiveTo optimize clinical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and evaluate the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), conventional medicine (CM), and integrated TCM- CM therapies.MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating integrated TCM–CM treatment for UC were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP Database, and SinoMed from database inception to June 2025. Study quality was assessed using Review Manager 5.4 and the 7-point Jadad scale. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata MP 15 and R 4.3.1 with Rstudio.ResultsA total of 46 RCTs involving 3,763 patients with UC were included, comprising seven intervention regimens: four commercial Chinese polyherbal preparation (e.g., Yunnan Baiyao) and sixteen classical TCM decoctions (TCMDs; e.g., Baitouweng Decoction). The results showed that conventional medicine combined with TCMD and acupoint catgut embedding achieved the highest total effective rate. CM alone ranked highest in alleviating key clinical symptoms (e.g., diarrhea and abdominal pain) and in reducing inflammatory markers, including IL-8, C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). For cytokine regulation, comparative advantages varied across interventions: CM + TCMD + acupuncture ranked highest for IL-6 reduction, CM + TCMD ranked highest for IL-10 improvement, whereas CM alone ranked lower for these two outcomes.ConclusionCompared with the single use of conventinal medicine, the combined use of traditional Chinese and conventinal medicine in the treatment of ulcerative colitis demonstrates greater overall efficacy. Through network meta-analysis, this study identified optimal intervention regimens for different outcome indicators, including both monotherapy and combination therapy. In clinical practice, the optimal regimens may be selected according to individual patient conditions. Although TCM interventions can improve clinical symptoms and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with ulcerative colitis, relevant clinical score improvement and endoscopic mucosal healing evidence are still insufficient. Further high-quality clinical evidence is still required to confirm the definite clinical efficacy of TCM.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=1109183, identifier CRD420251109183.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.