Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Retrospective FAERS analysis reveals sex-specific adverse event patterns for apremilast, crisaborole, and roflumilast in chronic inflammatory diseasesWhy Side Effects Hit Men and Women Differently

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note sex-specific disproportionality signals for apremilast, crisaborole, and roflumilast; interpret findings as associations requiring further mechanistic investigation.

This retrospective pharmacovigilance study examined 127,516 apremilast reports, 7,562 crisaborole reports, and 2,142 roflumilast reports submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The analysis focused on patients reporting adverse events associated with these medications for chronic inflammatory diseases. No comparator group was defined, and the study phase and publication type were not reported.

Disproportionality analysis identified sex-specific patterns. Females exhibited higher reporting of dizziness, palpitations, and infection-related adverse events. Conversely, male predominance was observed for product use issues. Additionally, malignancy- and metabolism-related events demonstrated male-skewed signals. Regarding time-to-onset, apremilast showed a substantially delayed onset compared with crisaborole and roflumilast. Absolute numbers and p-values were not reported for these specific outcomes.

Serious adverse events, discontinuations, and overall tolerability were not reported in the dataset. The study acknowledges that sex-specific safety profiles of these agents in routine clinical practice remain poorly characterized. Consequently, the need for sex-stratified risk communication and individualized monitoring strategies is highlighted. Further mechanistic investigations are required to clarify these associations versus causation.

Imagine taking a common prescription for skin or gut inflammation. You expect relief, not a new set of problems. Now imagine that the same medicine causes different issues depending on whether you were born male or female.

This is exactly what a massive new analysis has uncovered.

The Hidden Split in Medicine

Doctors have long used a specific class of drugs called PDE4 inhibitors to treat conditions like psoriasis and Crohn's disease. The most famous ones are apremilast, crisaborole, and roflumilast.

For years, we treated everyone the same. We assumed if a drug worked for one person, it would work for another. But this study suggests that biology is more complex than that.

Millions of people take these medications every day. They help clear up red, itchy skin and calm down inflamed guts. But side effects can be scary. Dizziness, heart palpitations, and infections are common worries.

The frustrating part? We didn't know who was most at risk until now. If a woman feels dizzy after taking a pill, doctors might think it's just a side effect. But what if men are less likely to report it? Or what if certain risks only show up in one sex?

The Surprising Shift

We used to think these drugs were safe for everyone. That belief is still true in general. But the details are changing.

This study looked at millions of reports from the FDA database. It found clear patterns that split by gender. For example, women reported more dizziness and heart issues with one specific drug. Men reported different problems with the others.

What Scientists Didn't Expect

Think of your body like a house with different locks on the doors. These drugs try to open specific locks to stop inflammation. But sometimes, the key gets stuck differently depending on the house.

In biology, men and women have different hormone levels and genetic structures. This study suggests those differences change how the drugs work inside the body. It's like a traffic jam: the same road gets clogged differently depending on who is driving.

Researchers dug through the FDA's safety database from 2004 to 2025. They looked at over 137,000 reports involving these three drugs.

They cleaned the data carefully to avoid counting the same mistake twice. Then, they used special math tools to find signals that stood out. They separated the results by sex to see the real differences.

The results were distinct for each drug.

With apremilast, women reported dizziness, heart racing, and infections much more often. The time it took for these side effects to start was also longer, averaging about three weeks.

Crisaborole showed a different picture. Men reported issues related to how the product was used more often. These problems usually showed up very quickly, often within just a few days.

Roflumilast had male-skewed signals. Men reported more issues related to metabolism and even cancer risks. Again, the timing was slow, taking about six weeks on average to appear.

This doesn't mean this treatment is available yet.

The Catch

Here is the important part: this does not mean these drugs are unsafe. It means we need to watch them more closely.

Doctors need to know that a woman might need different monitoring than a man. If a patient feels dizzy, the doctor should ask about their sex and medical history. This helps them decide if the side effect is normal or a warning sign.

Experts say this fits into a bigger trend. Medicine is moving toward "precision health." This means treating people based on their unique biology, not just their disease name.

This study adds to the growing pile of evidence that sex matters in drug safety. It pushes the medical community to talk openly about these risks.

If you take these medications, talk to your doctor about your history. Mention any side effects you feel, no matter how small they seem.

These drugs are still widely used and helpful. But being aware of the differences helps you stay safe. You might need to switch to a different drug if one doesn't fit your body well.

This study relies on reports sent to the FDA. People often forget to report minor side effects. This means the real numbers might be even higher than we see. Also, the data comes from reports, not a controlled experiment.

What happens next? Doctors will likely start asking about sex history more often when prescribing these drugs.

We may see new guidelines that tell doctors to watch for specific side effects in specific groups. More research will follow to understand exactly why these differences happen.

Until then, the message is simple: know your body, know your risks, and talk to your doctor.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionPhosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors, including apremilast, crisaborole and roflumilast, are widely prescribed for chronic inflammatory diseases. However, sex-specific safety profiles of these agents in routine clinical practice remain poorly characterized.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance study using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q1-2004 to Q1-2025. Data cleaning and deduplication were performed following the FDA Guidance for Industry: Pharmacovigilance Practices and Pharmacoepidemiologic Assessment (FDA, 2005). Specifically, deduplication was executed by retaining only the most recent FDA_DT for each unique CASEID, and demographic (DEMO), drug (DRUG), and reaction (REAC) files were merged. Reports listing apremilast, crisaborole, or roflumilast as primary suspect drugs formed three target cohorts. Disproportionality analyses were performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN, information component), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS, empirical Bayes geometric mean). Positive signals required meeting all four algorithmic thresholds. Signals were summarised at Preferred Term (PT) and System Organ Class (SOC) levels, stratified by sex, and visualised with volcano plots, forest plots, and SOC-level heatmaps. Time-to-onset (TTO) was calculated as the interval between treatment start and event onset.ResultsA total of 127,516 Apremilast, 7,562 Crisaborole, and 2,142 Roflumilast reports were included. Clear sex-specific disproportionality patterns emerged across the three agents. For Apremilast, females exhibited higher reporting of dizziness, palpitations, and infection-related adverse events, whereas Crisaborole showed a modest male predominance for “product use issue,” and Roflumilast demonstrated male-skewed signals, particularly for malignancy- and metabolism-related events. System Organ Class (SOC) analyses further revealed distinct organ-system involvement for each agent. Time-to-onset profiles showed substantially delayed onset for Apremilast compared with the more immediate onset observed for Crisaborole and Roflumilast. The median TTO (IQR) was 24 (7–86) days for Apremilast, 4 (1–15) days for Crisaborole, and 42 (14–128) days for Roflumilast.Discussion/ConclusionThis large-scale real-world analysis reveals pronounced sex-specific and drug-specific heterogeneity in the safety profiles of PDE4 inhibitors. These findings highlight the need for sex-stratified risk communication, individualized monitoring strategies, and further mechanistic investigations.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.