Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Inhaled treprostinil associated with 95.6 ml smaller FVC decline than placebo in IPFInhaled treprostinil slows lung function decline in pulmonary fibrosis

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider inhaled treprostinil to slow FVC decline and reduce clinical worsening in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

This Phase 3 randomized controlled trial enrolled 593 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) to evaluate inhaled treprostinil (12 breaths four times daily) versus placebo over 52 weeks.

At week 52, the treprostinil group showed a change in forced vital capacity (FVC) of -49.9 ml, while the placebo group showed a change of -136.4 ml. This represents a 95.6 ml difference (95% CI, 52.2 to 139.0; P<0.001). Additionally, treprostinil was associated with fewer clinical worsening events (27.2%) compared to placebo (39.0%) with a hazard ratio of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.53 to 0.95; P=0.02).

Safety data indicated a higher incidence of cough in the treprostinil group (48.3%) compared to placebo (24.1%). Discontinuation rates were 33.6% for treprostinil and 24.7% for placebo, with approximately half of those discontinuations attributed to adverse events.

A primary limitation was the lack of a substantial between-group difference in the time to IPF exacerbation, meaning no further inferences were made regarding other secondary endpoints. Inhaled treprostinil is associated with a smaller decline in FVC and fewer clinical-worsening events than placebo in patients with IPF.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding extends the previous report that inhaled treprostinil reduces FVC decline by 130.1 ml and clinical worsening in IPF. While the specific magnitude of FVC decline difference in this study was 95.6 ml, it reinforces the established efficacy of inhaled treprostinil in slowing lung function decline for this population.

Living with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) means dealing with a condition that causes lung tissue to scar and stiffen over time. This makes it harder to breathe and can lead to a steady decline in lung function. A large study of 593 patients looked at how an inhaled medication called treprostinil affected these symptoms over one year.

The results showed that patients who inhaled treprostinil experienced a much smaller drop in their forced vital capacity (the amount of air they could breathe out) compared to those who took a placebo. Additionally, the group using the inhaled medication had fewer instances of clinical worsening. While the treatment was effective at slowing these changes, it did cause more frequent coughing than the placebo.

It is important to note that while the treatment showed promise in slowing lung decline, the study did not find a significant difference in the time it took for patients to experience a sudden, acute flare-up of their condition. Because of this, researchers could not make further claims about other secondary outcomes like quality of life or gas exchange. Talk to your doctor to see if this treatment fits your specific needs.

What this means for you:
Inhaled treprostinil slowed the loss of lung capacity and reduced clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary fibrosis.

Common questions

How does treprostinil affect lung function?

In a study of 593 patients, those who inhaled treprostinil showed a much smaller decline in forced vital capacity over 52 weeks compared to those who received a placebo. The treprostinil group saw a decline of 49.9 ml, while the placebo group saw a decline of 136.4 ml.

Are there any side effects to this treatment?

The study found that patients taking treprostinil experienced more frequent coughing than those taking a placebo. Specifically, 48.3% of the treprostinil group reported a cough, compared to 24.1% in the placebo group. You should discuss these side effects with your doctor.

Does this treatment prevent sudden flare-ups of the disease?

The study did not find a substantial difference between the two groups regarding the time it took for a patient to experience an acute exacerbation of their condition. Because of this, the study could not make further claims about other secondary outcomes.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 593
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up12.0 mo
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Preclinical data indicate that inhaled treprostinil may be useful for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) through an antifibrotic mechanism, a premise that is supported by clinical observation. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with IPF to receive inhaled treprostinil or placebo (12 breaths four times daily) over a period of 52 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the absolute forced vital capacity (FVC) at week 52. Secondary end points, which were analyzed in a prespecified order to control for multiplicity, were clinical worsening and acute exacerbation of IPF (each assessed in a time-to-event analysis), death by week 52, and the change from baseline in the percentage of predicted FVC, quality of life, and the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide by week 52. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 593 patients underwent randomization and received at least one dose of treprostinil (298 patients) or placebo (295 patients). Of these, 463 patients (224 in the treprostinil group and 239 in the placebo group) completed the trial assessments through week 52. The mean age of the patients was 71.7 years, 80.1% were men, the mean FVC at baseline was 76.8%, and 75.4% of the patients were receiving background antifibrotic therapy. The median change in FVC at week 52 was -49.9 ml (95% confidence interval [CI], -79.2 to -19.5) in the treprostinil group and -136.4 ml (95% CI, -172.5 to -104.0) in the placebo group; the between-group difference in the change in FVC was 95.6 ml (95% CI, 52.2 to 139.0; P<0.001). Clinical worsening occurred in 81 patients (27.2%) in the treprostinil group and 115 patients (39.0%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.95; P = 0.02). No substantial between-group difference in the time to IPF exacerbation was observed, and so no further inferences with regard to subsequent secondary end points were made. The most common adverse event was cough, reported in 48.3% of the patients in the treprostinil group and 24.1% of those in the placebo group. Discontinuation of treprostinil or placebo occurred in 33.6% and 24.7%, respectively, with approximately half these patients citing adverse events as the primary reason for discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IPF, inhaled treprostinil was associated with a smaller decline in FVC and fewer clinical-worsening events than placebo over a period of 52 weeks. (Funded by United Therapeutics; TETON-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05255991.).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.