Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

OnabotulinumtoxinA 72 U reduces masseter prominence versus placebo in adults.

OnabotulinumtoxinA 72 U reduces masseter prominence versus placebo in adults.
Photo by Andreas Schmidt / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider onabotulinumtoxinA 72 U for masseter reduction, noting the significant trial results and favorable safety profile.

This was a Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, multiregional trial in 376 adults with Grade 4 or 5 masseter muscle prominence (MMP) on the investigator-assessed MMP Scale. The study was a prospective, multicenter trial with a 6.0-month follow-up period.

Participants received either onabotulinumtoxinA 72 U or a placebo comparator. The primary outcome was a ≥2-grade improvement from baseline on the investigator-assessed MMPS.

The main results showed that 51.2% of participants in the onabotulinumtoxinA group achieved the primary outcome, compared to 2.2% in the placebo group (P < .0001). For lower-facial width reduction, the mean change was -5.24 mm with onabotulinumtoxinA versus -0.04 mm with placebo (P < .0001).

Safety data indicated that most adverse events were mild, nonserious, and resolved. The trial reported a favorable safety profile. Key limitations include the lack of reported funding or conflicts, and the absence of reported practice relevance or causality notes.

These results suggest a potential benefit for onabotulinumtoxinA in reducing masseter prominence, but the findings are specific to the trial population and follow-up duration.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 283
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up6.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Masseter muscle prominence (MMP) may be aesthetically bothersome to some individuals, leading them to seek treatment for a slimmer lower face. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of MMP, including patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter trial including a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period (Days 1-180) in which adults rated Grade 4 or 5 (marked/very marked) on the investigator-assessed MMP Scale (MMPS) were randomized to onabotulinumtoxinA 72 U or placebo. Efficacy endpoints were assessed at Day 90. The primary endpoint was ≥2-grade improvement from baseline on the investigator-assessed MMPS. Secondary endpoints included achieving Grade ≤3 on the MMPS and participant-assessed MMPS-Participant (MMPS-P), ≥2-grade improvement on the participant-assessed MMPS-P, and change from baseline in lower-facial width. Outcomes were assessed using validated measures. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. RESULTS: Of 376 enrolled participants (onabotulinumtoxinA, n = 283; placebo, n = 93), 310 (82.4%) completed the study. At Day 90, a greater proportion of onabotulinumtoxinA-treated participants vs placebo achieved MMPS ≥2-grade improvement (51.2% vs 2.2%, P < .0001), and more onabotulinumtoxinA-treated participants vs placebo achieved the secondary endpoints (all P < .0001), with a mean lower-facial width reduction of -5.24 mm for onabotulinumtoxinA vs -0.04 mm for placebo (P < .0001). Participants reported benefits for onabotulinumtoxinA vs placebo in self-perceived change in MMP, treatment satisfaction, and psychosocial impact. Improvements were sustained through Day 180. Most AEs were mild, nonserious, and resolved. CONCLUSIONS: OnabotulinumtoxinA effectively reduced the appearance of MMP and improved PROs, with effects lasting up to 6 months and a favorable safety profile.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.