Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Narrative review of Shenfu Injection for sepsis-induced gastrointestinal injury and septic shock

Narrative review of Shenfu Injection for sepsis-induced gastrointestinal injury and septic shock
Photo by Ayanda Kunene / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider Shenfu Injection potential for sepsis GI injury, but efficacy claims remain insufficient.

This narrative review evaluates Shenfu Injection in the context of sepsis-induced acute gastrointestinal injury and septic shock. The scope includes a synthesis of mechanistic basis and preclinical findings alongside available clinical evidence. The authors note substantial heterogeneity in study design, models, interventions, and outcomes as a primary limitation. Small sample size and single-center design are also cited as constraints. Insufficient methodological reporting further limits the strength of the conclusions drawn.

The mechanistic analysis suggests Shenfu Injection exerts effects through multiple targets. These include inhibiting the Toll-like receptor 4/Nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathway to reduce intestinal inflammation. The drug upregulates tight junction proteins such as zonula occludens-1 and Occludin, reducing epithelial cell apoptosis. It also modulates immune molecules to protect the physical and immune barriers of the intestinal mucosa. Improvements in microcirculation and tissue perfusion are also described as potential mechanisms.

Clinical evidence suggests potential benefits in selected physiological and surrogate endpoints. However, absolute numbers and effect sizes are not reported for these outcomes. The review concludes that validation through high-quality multicenter randomized controlled trials and further mechanistic studies are needed. Current clinical evidence remains insufficient to support definitive efficacy claims regarding Shenfu Injection.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Shenfu Injection (SFI) is a standardized botanical drug derived from two Chinese medicinal herbs Panax ginseng C.A.Mey. and Aconitum carmichaelii Debeaux. SFI is historically used for “restoring yang and reversing collapse.” It is now widely applied in the treatment of septic shock. The gastrointestinal tract is considered the “engine” of sepsis, and its injury can lead to mucosal barrier disruption and secondary infection. The aim of this narrative review was to summarize the mechanistic basis, preclinical findings and available clinical evidence regarding the role of SFI in sepsis-induced acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI), while critically appraising the strengths and limitations of the current evidence base. A structured literature search of major English- and Chinese-language databases was performed. Preclinical and clinical studies were screened according to predefined inclusion criteria. Due to substantial heterogeneity in study design, models, interventions and outcomes, a quantitative meta-analysis was not performed. Research indicates SFI exerts effects through multiple targets: inhibiting the Toll-like receptor 4/Nuclear factor kappa B signaling (TLR4/NF-κB) pathway to reduce intestinal inflammation; upregulating tight junction (TJ) proteins such as zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and Occludin, reducing epithelial cell apoptosis, and modulating immune molecules to protect the physical and immune barriers of the intestinal mucosa; improving microcirculation and tissue perfusion; and potentially modulating gut microbiota composition. Although available clinical studies suggest potential benefits in selected physiological and surrogate endpoints, but most are constrained by small sample size, single-center design, and insufficient methodological reporting. Careful attention is also warranted to safety considerations, particularly aconite-related toxicity, standardization of preparation, and quality control, also warrant careful attention. Overall, SFI shows potential in stabilizing hemodynamics and maintaining the intestinal barrier, but current clinical evidence remains insufficient to support definitive efficacy claims. Validation through high-quality multicenter randomized controlled trials and further mechanistic studies are needed.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.