Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Review of natural products in preclinical cancer models notes methodological variability and bioavailability differences

Review of natural products in preclinical cancer models notes methodological variability and…
Photo by Nigel Hoare / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note variability in preclinical natural product studies limits immediate clinical translation.

This publication is a review of natural products within preclinical cancer models. The study phase is preclinical and the setting involves preclinical models. The sample size is not reported. The intervention or exposure is natural products and the comparator is not reported. Primary outcomes and secondary outcomes are not reported. Safety data including adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability are not reported. Follow-up duration is not reported.

The authors synthesize key limitations including variability between studies in terms of the methods used for validation of the mechanism by which these compounds function. Differences in their bioavailability and the overall robustness of those studies are also noted as significant gaps.

The review concludes that these findings support the development of targeted phytopharmaceutical approaches and promote the integration of these therapies into evidence-based oncology practices. Practice relevance is framed cautiously given the preclinical nature of the evidence and the lack of reported adverse events or specific outcome data.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Genetic or epigenetic changes that lead to abnormal development of signalling through cellular pathways such as MAPK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin play an important role in driving cancer. These signalling pathways control how cells grow, divide and die (apoptosis). Thus, the continued activation of these pathways represents a characteristic of oncogenesis as well as a suitable target for treatment. This review will highlight how natural products have been shown to modify the molecular pathways involved with these signalling cascades in preclinical cancer models. Data derived from an array of preclinical studies showcase how the bioactive phytochemicals that comprise these products are implemented in the form of targeting cancer cells through specific inhibition of signalling pathways, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of tumour growth and alteration of oncogenic crosstalk. Despite the significant body of evidence, there are still several limitations that exist in regards to variability between studies in terms of the methods used for validation of the mechanism by which these compounds function, differences in their bioavailability and overall robustness of those studies. Using a pathway-centered understanding of the mechanisms by which natural compounds exert their therapeutic effects will support the development of targeted phytopharmaceutical approaches and promote the integration of these therapies into evidence-based oncology practices.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.