Review of natural products in preclinical cancer models notes methodological variability and bioavailability differences
This publication is a review of natural products within preclinical cancer models. The study phase is preclinical and the setting involves preclinical models. The sample size is not reported. The intervention or exposure is natural products and the comparator is not reported. Primary outcomes and secondary outcomes are not reported. Safety data including adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability are not reported. Follow-up duration is not reported.
The authors synthesize key limitations including variability between studies in terms of the methods used for validation of the mechanism by which these compounds function. Differences in their bioavailability and the overall robustness of those studies are also noted as significant gaps.
The review concludes that these findings support the development of targeted phytopharmaceutical approaches and promote the integration of these therapies into evidence-based oncology practices. Practice relevance is framed cautiously given the preclinical nature of the evidence and the lack of reported adverse events or specific outcome data.