Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Tachypnoea at 60 breaths per minute increases odds of mortality in infants with sepsisRapid breathing in infants linked to higher sepsis mortality

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that tachypnoea $\geq$60 bpm is associated with higher mortality odds in infants but has low sensitivity alone.

This meta-analysis evaluates the association between tachypnoea and clinical outcomes in infants aged 0 to 59 days. The study specifically examines how different respiratory rate thresholds correlate with mortality and culture-confirmed sepsis.

For a threshold of 60 bpm, the analysis found an increased odds of mortality (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.30 to 7.56). For this same threshold, the sensitivity for mortality was 31% and specificity was 89%. When assessing culture-confirmed sepsis at the 60 bpm threshold, the odds were higher (OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.66 to 2.38), with a sensitivity of 28% and specificity of 67%. At a higher threshold of 70 bpm, mortality odds increased significantly (OR 10.06; 95% CI 2.39 to 42.35), though sensitivity dropped to 10.9% while specificity reached 99.4%.

The authors note that data were insufficient to assess performance by age subgroup, specifically comparing infants aged 0 to 6 days versus 7 to 59 days. The certainty of evidence is very low. Clinically, tachypnoea at 60 bpm is associated with a threefold increased odds of mortality in young infants; however, because sensitivity is relatively low, it should be interpreted alongside other clinical signs.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in identifying early clinical indicators for infant sepsis. It complements existing evidence regarding skin perfusion parameters (Mottling Score, CRT, and PPI) as markers of mortality risk in sepsis patients. While this study identifies tachypnoea at 60 bpm as an indicator of increased mortality odds, the low certainty of evidence suggests it should be used as one component of a broader clinical assessment rather than a standalone diagnostic tool.

When an infant is fighting a severe infection like sepsis, every second counts. Doctors look for clear signs to determine which babies need the most intensive care immediately. New data looking at over 92,000 infants suggests that rapid breathing, known as tachypnoea, is a significant indicator of risk.

The study found that infants with a breathing rate of 60 breaths per minute or more had much higher odds of mortality. Specifically, those hitting a threshold of 70 breaths per minute showed even higher odds of death and were very likely to be in a critical state. While rapid breathing is a strong indicator when it happens, the researchers noted that it does not catch every case on its own.

Because the evidence for these findings is currently considered low certainty, doctors should not use breathing rates alone to make decisions. Instead, they use these numbers alongside other clinical signs to get a full picture of an infant's health. The goal is to provide a clearer warning sign for those most in need of urgent medical attention.

What this means for you:
Rapid breathing in infants is linked to higher mortality risk in cases of sepsis.

Common questions

What is tachypnoea?

Tachypnoea is the medical term for breathing that is too fast. In this study, researchers looked at infants with a breathing rate of 60 or more breaths per minute. This rapid breathing can be an important sign when doctors are trying to identify serious infections like sepsis in newborns.

How does breathing rate affect the risk for infants with sepsis?

Infants with a breathing rate of 60 breaths per minute or more showed a threefold increased odds of mortality. When the breathing rate reached 70 breaths per minute, the odds of mortality were even higher. These numbers help doctors identify which babies are at the highest risk.

Can doctors rely only on breathing rates to treat sepsis?

No, breathing rate should not be used alone. While a high breathing rate is linked to higher mortality, it has relatively low sensitivity on its own. This means it might not catch every case of sepsis. Doctors must use these findings alongside other clinical signs to make treatment decisions.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 92
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Tachypnoea is a danger sign for predicting mortality and identifying sepsis. We systematically reviewed evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of different tachypnoea thresholds for predicting mortality and sepsis in infants aged 0-59 days. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus and CENTRAL for studies reporting associations or diagnostic accuracy of tachypnoea (≥60, ≥70 or ≥80 breaths per minute (bpm)) for predicting mortality and culture-confirmed sepsis in infants aged 0-59 days. We followed Cochrane methods for study screening, data extraction and quality assessment. We pooled ORs using random-effects models and sensitivity/specificity using random-effects bivariate models. We used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to assess the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Of 7641 studies identified, 18 were included (n=92 398). Tachypnoea≥60 bpm had a pooled OR of 3.14 (95% CI 1.30 to 7.56; 5 studies; n=10 407) for predicting mortality and a sensitivity of 31% (95% CI 19% to 45%) and a specificity of 89% (95% CI 66% to 97%; 4 studies; n=7104). For culture-confirmed sepsis, tachypnoea≥60 bpm had an OR of 1.26 (95% CI 0.66 to 2.38; 4 studies; n=3996), and a sensitivity of 28% (95% CI 10% to 58%) and a specificity of 67% (95% CI 53% to 78%; 3 studies; n=693). The higher threshold of tachypnoea≥70 bpm was associated with a higher odds of mortality (OR 10.06 (95% CI 2.39 to 42.35); 2 studies; n=12 138) and resulted in higher specificity (99.4% (95% CI 99.1% to 99.6%)) but lower sensitivity (10.9% (95% CI 5.3% to 19.1%)) for mortality (1 study; n=5214). Data were insufficient to assess performance by age subgroup (0-6 vs 7-59 days). The certainty of evidence was very low. CONCLUSIONS: Tachypnoea≥60 bpm is associated with a threefold increased odds of mortality in young infants, supporting its use as a danger sign. Given its relatively low sensitivity alone, tachypnoea should be interpreted alongside other clinical signs to optimise diagnostic accuracy. While higher thresholds (≥70 bpm) demonstrated stronger associations and increased specificity for predicting mortality, low sensitivity may limit clinical utility. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023431387.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.