Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Efficacy of Golimumab in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis and Axial SpondyloarthritisGolimumab improves symptoms for patients with ankylosing spondylitis

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Golimumab significantly improves short-term symptoms and signs in patients with AS and axSpA compared to placebo.

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of subcutaneous or intravenous golimumab in 834 randomized patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The primary outcomes focused on ASAS20, ASAS40, and BASDAI50 scores at weeks 14 to 16, with extension studies providing data on long-term durability.

Results indicated that golimumab significantly outperformed placebo across all primary endpoints. Specifically, the risk ratio for ASAS20 was 2.22, while ASAS40 showed a risk ratio of 3.25. The BASDAI50 metric also showed a substantial improvement with a risk ratio of 2.82, suggesting robust clinical benefits for patients experiencing active inflammation.

While the primary outcomes showed high to moderate certainty, the data regarding the durability of response and safety profiles are less robust. Safety data were sparse, making it difficult to rule out differences in serious adverse events. Additionally, all included trials were industry-sponsored, which may impact the overall certainty of the long-term findings.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis provides evidence for pharmacological management of ankylosing spondylitis and axial spondyloarthritis. It addresses a gap in quantifying the specific magnitude of response for golimumab compared to placebo. While previous evidence noted that the Axia smartphone application can increase ASAS20 response to 51% in axSpA patients, this meta-analysis quantifies the significant short-term efficacy of golimumab, specifically showing an RR 3.25 for ASAS40.

Living with ankylosing spondylitis or axial spondyloarthritis can mean dealing with persistent joint pain and stiffness. A large review of data from 834 patients looked at how the medication golimumab works compared to a placebo. The results showed that golimumab significantly improved physical signs and symptoms for these patients in the short term.

Specifically, the study found that golimumab helped more people reach key improvement goals compared to a placebo. While the data shows the drug is effective for managing symptoms, there are some important notes to keep in mind. Because the safety data was sparse, it is hard to tell if there are major differences in serious side effects between the drug and a placebo.

Additionally, while the drug shows strong results early on, the evidence regarding how long these improvements last is currently very weak. Because all the trials included in this review were funded by the industry, the findings should be viewed with that context in mind. Talk to your doctor to see if this treatment fits your specific needs.

What this means for you:
Golimumab significantly improves short-term symptoms for patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Common questions

How effective is golimumab for ankylosing spondylitis?

Golimumab significantly improves short-term signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis and axial spondyloarthritis compared to a placebo. In studies, it helped more patients reach key improvement goals, such as the ASAS20 and ASAS40 marks, which measure physical progress.

Is golimumab safe to use?

The risk of any adverse event was similar to a placebo. However, the data on serious adverse events was very imprecise because only a small number of events were recorded across three trials. Because safety data is sparse, it is hard to rule out differences in serious side effects.

How long do the benefits of golimumab last?

While the drug shows strong results in the short term, the evidence regarding the durability of the response is of very low certainty. This means we do not have high-quality data yet to confirm how long the benefits will continue over a long period.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedNov 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundGolimumab is an approved tumor necrosis factor inhibitor for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Although randomized controlled trials have demonstrated its efficacy, evidence regarding long-term treatment maintenance remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy, safety, and durability of golimumab therapy in patients with AS and axSpA.MethodsThis review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251130466). PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to January 2026. Randomized placebo-controlled trials of subcutaneous or intravenous golimumab were pooled using random-effects risk ratios (RRs) with Hartung–Knapp 95% confidence intervals (CIs), analyzing the approved dose in multi-arm trials; extension studies were synthesized separately as single-arm proportions. Primary outcomes were ASAS20, ASAS40, BASDAI50, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 (trials) and the NHLBI before–after tool (extensions), and certainty with GRADE.ResultsSeven publications representing four independent trials (834 randomized patients) were included. At Weeks 14–16, golimumab increased ASAS20 (RR 2.22, 95% CI 1.51–3.27; high certainty), ASAS40 (RR 3.25, 95% CI 1.89–5.59; high certainty), and BASDAI50 responses (RR 2.82, 95% CI 1.39–5.71; moderate certainty), corresponding to approximately 300–350 additional responders per 1,000 patients treated. Effects favored golimumab in both radiographic AS and non-radiographic axSpA, with no statistically significant subgroup difference (ASAS20, p = 0.065). Evidence on SAEs was very imprecise (three trials, 14 events; RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.08–8.54; low certainty), and the risk of any adverse event was similar to placebo (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.85–1.29). In uncontrolled extensions, 72% (95% CI 35%–92%) and 63% (95% CI 31%–86%) of patients originally randomized to golimumab had ASAS20 and ASAS40 responses at Weeks 52–104 (very low certainty).ConclusionHigh- to moderate-certainty randomized evidence shows that golimumab substantially improves short-term signs and symptoms of AS and axSpA compared with placebo. Safety data are too sparse to exclude important differences in serious adverse events, and evidence on durability of response is of very low certainty. All included trials were industry-sponsored, and independent long-term comparative studies are needed.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251130466, PROSPERO CRD420251130466.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.