Video call-assisted dispatcher guidance improves CPR quality metrics in simulation study of untrained students
This randomized, single-blind trial evaluated video call-assisted dispatcher guidance (V-CPR) versus telephone guidance (T-CPR) for bystander CPR in a simulated adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest scenario. The study enrolled 85 university students without prior CPR training who performed 5 minutes of CPR on manikins. The primary outcome was a composite CPR Quality Score generated by the manikin feedback system.
V-CPR significantly improved the composite CPR Quality Score compared to T-CPR, with a median difference of -47 (95% CI, -60 to -36; P < .001). The V-CPR group demonstrated greater mean compression depth, higher proportions of compressions within recommended rate and depth ranges, and shorter interruption times between compressions. However, the T-CPR group showed shorter time from case recognition to EMS call, while the interval from dispatcher contact to CPR initiation was similar between groups.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the simulation study design using manikins and the population limited to university students, who were young and healthy without prior CPR training. Clinical outcomes such as survival were not measured.
For practice, these findings suggest structured visual modeling integrated into dispatcher-assisted CPR systems may enhance bystander resuscitation performance in simulated settings. However, results from this manikin-based trial with a specific student population may not directly translate to real-world clinical outcomes or diverse community settings.