Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Testosterone gel fails to normalize serum levels in critically ill ICU patients in pilot RCTCan testosterone gel help critically ill men? A small study finds no clear benefit

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Interpret negative pilot RCT of testosterone gel in ICU patients with caution due to small size and open-label design.

This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated testosterone transdermal gel (Androgel) administered for 14 days versus control in 30 critically ill ICU patients requiring vasopressors and mechanical ventilation for at least two days. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients achieving normal serum total testosterone values on days 4, 7, 10, and 14. The study found no significant difference between groups for this outcome, though specific percentages, effect sizes, and p-values were not reported.

Regarding safety, the study reported no significant differences between groups in terms of cardiovascular events and cytolysis. However, other adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuation rates were not reported, limiting the safety assessment.

Key limitations include the open-label study design, monocentric setting, and very small sample size typical of a pilot study. Funding and conflicts of interest were not reported. The practice relevance is minimal at this stage; testosterone gel did not demonstrate efficacy in normalizing serum levels in this specific, severely ill population. This negative finding from a small pilot trial suggests the intervention may not be effective, but definitive conclusions require larger, blinded studies.

Imagine being so sick you need machines to breathe and drugs to keep your blood pressure up. For men in this terrifying situation, the body's testosterone levels often crash. Doctors wondered if a simple testosterone skin gel could help restore this vital hormone. They tested it in 30 critically ill men who were on breathing machines and blood pressure support for at least two days. The goal was to see if the gel could get testosterone levels back to normal over two weeks. The result? The gel didn't significantly increase the number of patients with normal testosterone levels compared to the control group. In terms of safety, the researchers reported no significant differences in heart-related events or signs of liver injury between the groups. It's crucial to remember this was a small, preliminary pilot study. The doctors and patients knew who was getting the gel, which can influence results. The small number of patients means we can't say for sure what would happen in a larger, more diverse group. This study tells us the gel, as used here, didn't show a clear effect, but it's just the first step in asking this important question.

What this means for you:
In a small ICU study, testosterone gel did not restore normal hormone levels better than control.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 30
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Critical illness is associated with hypercatabolism, systemic inflammatory dysregulation and low serum concentration of testosterone (T) leading to intensive care unit (ICU) acquired weakness and altered outcome. T supplementation benefit has been reported in several illnesses but data in non-burned ICU patients are scarce. In this context, the purpose of the TestICUs-1 study was to assess the pharmacokinetic and safety of T-gel administration in ICU patients. METHODS: TestICUs-1 was an open, monocentric, randomized controlled study carried out in ICU patients receiving vasopressors, and mechanical ventilation for at least two days. Exclusion criteria included prostate or breast cancer, PSA levels >4 ng/mL and age ≥ 80 years. The T group received a 14-day administration of T transdermal gel (Androgel©). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with serum Total T value within normal ranges on days 4, 7, 10 and 14. The safety of T-gel was also assessed. RESULTS: 30 patients were included, 19 (63 %) were men. At inclusion, none of the men and half of the women presented a serum Total T values within normal range. On days 4, 7, 10 and 14, the percentage of patients with a normal serum Total T value did not differ between T administered patients and controls. No significant differences between groups were reported in terms of cardiovascular events and cytolysis. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of T-gel did not increase significantly the percentage of patients with normal serum T values as compared to control.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.