Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Persistent ymrEMVI and ymrTD on post-neoadjuvant MRI predict inferior disease-free and overall survival in rectal cancer patients

Persistent ymrEMVI and ymrTD on post-neoadjuvant MRI predict inferior disease-free and overall…
Photo by David Trinks / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider persistent ymrEMVI and ymrTD as markers for inferior survival in rectal cancer patients.

This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the prognostic value of persistent MRI-detected extramural venous invasion (ymrEMVI) and tumour deposits (ymrTD) in patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant treatment. The analysis included 3932 patients and evaluated disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as primary outcomes.

Persistent ymrEMVI was associated with inferior DFS (HR 2.12; 95% CI 1.75-2.56) and inferior OS (HR 2.21; 95% CI 1.63-2.99). Similarly, ymrTD positivity correlated with inferior DFS (HR 2.85; 95% CI 1.58-5.17) and inferior OS (HR 2.12; 95% CI 1.20-3.74). Post-treatment nodal status showed inconsistent associations with survival outcomes.

The authors highlight that the prognostic relevance of these markers when persisting on post-neoadjuvant MRI remains poorly defined. They state that incorporation of ymrEMVI and ymrTD into post-treatment risk stratification and trial design is urgently required to guide intensification strategies and personalize rectal cancer management. Safety data and adverse events were not reported in this review.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 3,932
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Extramural venous invasion (EMVI) and tumour deposits (TDs) are recognised markers of aggressive rectal cancer biology at baseline. However, their prognostic relevance when persisting on post-neoadjuvant MRI remains poorly defined. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the oncologic impact of persistent MRI-detected EMVI (ymrEMVI) and tumour deposits (ymrTD) and to compare their predictive value with post-treatment nodal status. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to December 2025. Studies reporting post-neoadjuvant MRI assessment of EMVI and/or TDs with time-to-event outcomes were included. Random-effects meta-analyses generated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: Seventeen studies encompassing 3932 patients met inclusion criteria. Persistent ymrEMVI was strongly associated with inferior DFS (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.75-2.56) and OS (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.63-2.99). ymrTD positivity conferred an even greater adverse impact on DFS (HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.58-5.17) and OS (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.20-3.74). In contrast, post-treatment nodal status demonstrated inconsistent associations with DFS across studies. These vascular invasion phenotypes showed stronger and more reproducible prognostic value than residual nodal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent EMVI and tumour deposits on post-neoadjuvant MRI identify a high-risk biological subgroup with markedly inferior survival, outperforming nodal status as prognostic indicators. Incorporation of ymrEMVI and ymrTD into post-treatment risk stratification and trial design is urgently required to guide intensification strategies and personalise rectal cancer management.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.