Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Post hoc analysis links TMB ≥9 or BRAF-V600E to longer PFS with chemo-nivolumab in MSS/pMMR mCRCCould two simple blood tests help predict which colon cancer patients benefit from immunotherapy?

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider TMB ≥9 or BRAF-V600E as exploratory biomarkers for chemo-IO response in MSS/pMMR mCRC; findings require validation.

This is a post hoc, exploratory biomarker analysis of the METIMMOX randomized controlled trial. The study population consisted of patients with metastatic microsatellite-stable/mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer. The analysis compared outcomes based on tumor mutational burden (TMB), BRAF-V600E mutation status, and systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein) among patients who received either alternating oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and nivolumab or chemotherapy alone.

In the experimental arm, patients with TMB ≥9 or a BRAF-V600E mutation (n=17) had a median progression-free survival of 19.8 months (95% CI, 11.3-28.3), which was statistically longer than other patient groups (p=0.0090). A further subgroup of 11 patients from the experimental arm who had these biomarkers (TMB ≥9 or BRAF-V600E) and a normal, non-inflammatory CRP level at the start of nivolumab treatment had a median PFS of 35.0 months (95% CI, 6.8-63.0; p<0.0001). The median TMB in the cohort was 8 (range, 1-13).

Safety and tolerability data for these specific subgroups were not reported. Key limitations include the post hoc, exploratory nature of the analysis, small subgroup sample sizes (n=17 and n=11 for the main findings), and the need for prospective validation. The findings are associations from a biomarker analysis and do not establish causality.

For clinical practice, the results suggest TMB, somatic BRAF status, and systemic inflammation should be prospectively investigated as potential biomarkers for predicting responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in this patient population. However, these are not established predictive markers and should not guide treatment decisions outside of a clinical trial context.

Immunotherapy has been a game-changer for many cancers, but for most people with advanced colon cancer, it hasn't worked. Doctors have been searching for clues to predict who might be an exception. A new, deep-dive analysis of an older trial offers a possible answer, but it comes with important caveats.

The study looked back at patients with metastatic microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer—the common type that usually resists immunotherapy. All patients were part of a trial testing alternating cycles of standard chemotherapy with the immunotherapy drug nivolumab. Researchers then checked patients' tumors for two things: a high number of mutations (called tumor mutational burden or TMB) or a specific BRAF gene mutation. They also checked a simple blood test for inflammation (C-reactive protein or CRP).

They found that in the group receiving the chemo-immunotherapy combo, the 17 patients who had either a high TMB or the BRAF mutation had a median time without their cancer getting worse of 19.8 months. That was longer than patients without these features. Even more striking, the 11 patients in this group who also started immunotherapy with normal, non-inflammatory CRP levels had a median progression-free survival of 35.0 months. However, this is a post-hoc analysis—meaning researchers looked for patterns after the trial was over. The subgroups are very small, and these findings are exploratory associations, not proof. The results need to be tested prospectively in new, dedicated studies.

What this means for you:
Early clues hint at who with common colon cancer might respond to immunotherapy, but it's not a proven test yet.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up19.8 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: The randomised METIMMOX trial evaluated short-course oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy alternating with nivolumab for metastatic microsatellite-stable/mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer. In a post hoc analysis, we investigated whether tumour mutations or patients' systemic inflammation might provide insights into responsiveness to the METIMMOX regimen. METHODS: Patients received either oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (control group) or alternating two cycles each of chemotherapy and nivolumab (experimental group), with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint. Tumour biopsies were sequenced with the TruSight Oncology 500 assay. RESULTS: The median tumour mutational burden (TMB; in mutations/megabase) was 8 (range, 1-13). The experimental-arm patients with TMB ≥9 or BRAF-V600E mutation (n = 17) achieved median PFS of 19.8 months (95% confidence interval, 11.3-28.3), longer (p = 0.0090) than experimental-arm patients with TMB < 9 not BRAF-V600E (n = 19) and control-arm patients with either TMB and BRAF status combination (n = 31). With TMB ≥9 or BRAF-V600E and normal, non-inflammatory level of C-reactive protein when starting nivolumab (n = 11), median PFS was 35.0 months (95% confidence interval, 6.8-63.0; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: TMB, somatic BRAF status and systemic inflammation should be prospectively investigated as practical biomarkers for predicting potential responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic microsatellite-stable/mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.