Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Post hoc analysis links TMB ≥9 or BRAF-V600E to longer PFS with chemo-nivolumab in MSS/pMMR mCRC

Post hoc analysis links TMB ≥9 or BRAF-V600E to longer PFS with chemo-nivolumab in MSS/pMMR mCRC
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider TMB ≥9 or BRAF-V600E as exploratory biomarkers for chemo-IO response in MSS/pMMR mCRC; findings require validation.

This is a post hoc, exploratory biomarker analysis of the METIMMOX randomized controlled trial. The study population consisted of patients with metastatic microsatellite-stable/mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer. The analysis compared outcomes based on tumor mutational burden (TMB), BRAF-V600E mutation status, and systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein) among patients who received either alternating oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and nivolumab or chemotherapy alone.

In the experimental arm, patients with TMB ≥9 or a BRAF-V600E mutation (n=17) had a median progression-free survival of 19.8 months (95% CI, 11.3-28.3), which was statistically longer than other patient groups (p=0.0090). A further subgroup of 11 patients from the experimental arm who had these biomarkers (TMB ≥9 or BRAF-V600E) and a normal, non-inflammatory CRP level at the start of nivolumab treatment had a median PFS of 35.0 months (95% CI, 6.8-63.0; p<0.0001). The median TMB in the cohort was 8 (range, 1-13).

Safety and tolerability data for these specific subgroups were not reported. Key limitations include the post hoc, exploratory nature of the analysis, small subgroup sample sizes (n=17 and n=11 for the main findings), and the need for prospective validation. The findings are associations from a biomarker analysis and do not establish causality.

For clinical practice, the results suggest TMB, somatic BRAF status, and systemic inflammation should be prospectively investigated as potential biomarkers for predicting responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in this patient population. However, these are not established predictive markers and should not guide treatment decisions outside of a clinical trial context.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up19.8 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: The randomised METIMMOX trial evaluated short-course oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy alternating with nivolumab for metastatic microsatellite-stable/mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer. In a post hoc analysis, we investigated whether tumour mutations or patients' systemic inflammation might provide insights into responsiveness to the METIMMOX regimen. METHODS: Patients received either oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (control group) or alternating two cycles each of chemotherapy and nivolumab (experimental group), with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint. Tumour biopsies were sequenced with the TruSight Oncology 500 assay. RESULTS: The median tumour mutational burden (TMB; in mutations/megabase) was 8 (range, 1-13). The experimental-arm patients with TMB ≥9 or BRAF-V600E mutation (n = 17) achieved median PFS of 19.8 months (95% confidence interval, 11.3-28.3), longer (p = 0.0090) than experimental-arm patients with TMB < 9 not BRAF-V600E (n = 19) and control-arm patients with either TMB and BRAF status combination (n = 31). With TMB ≥9 or BRAF-V600E and normal, non-inflammatory level of C-reactive protein when starting nivolumab (n = 11), median PFS was 35.0 months (95% confidence interval, 6.8-63.0; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: TMB, somatic BRAF status and systemic inflammation should be prospectively investigated as practical biomarkers for predicting potential responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic microsatellite-stable/mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.