Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds 4% HBV transmission risk in kidney transplants from active HBV donorsKidney transplants from donors with active hepatitis B show low transmission risk in review

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider donor NAT status and recipient immunity when evaluating HBV-positive donors for kidney transplantation.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission from donors with active HBV (positive HBsAg and/or nucleic acid test [NAT]) to HBsAg-negative kidney transplant recipients. The analysis included 20 cohorts involving 600 recipients, with most donors being living (52%) and having negative NAT (60%). Most recipients had positive surface antibody (>10 IU/L, 86%), and 49% received antiviral prophylaxis.

The pooled HBV transmission rate was 4.0% (95% CI, 1.8%-8.3%), representing 29 of 600 recipients. Most transmissions (62%) were transient low-level viremia only. However, transmission risk varied substantially by donor and recipient characteristics: it was 16.0% (95% CI, 10.2%-24.3%) when all donors had positive NAT, but only 0.8% (95% CI, 0.1%-6.4%) when all recipients were living donors and 1.4% (95% CI, 0.2%-8.8%) when all recipients had positive surface antibody.

Safety data were limited, but three deaths occurred because of HBV transmissions, all among recipients not taking posttransplant antiviral prophylaxis. The pooled estimate showed low heterogeneity (I² = 0%) but some between-study variance. Key limitations include the observational nature of the included studies, lack of reported follow-up duration, and incomplete reporting of antiviral prophylaxis regimens. The findings support risk-stratified consideration of such transplants with informed consent and appropriate monitoring and prophylaxis.

Researchers analyzed data from 20 previous studies involving 600 kidney transplant patients. These patients received kidneys from donors who had active hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections, while the recipients themselves did not have active HBV. Most donors were living, and most recipients had some protective antibodies against hepatitis B. About half of the recipients received antiviral medication to help prevent infection.

The analysis found that overall, about 4% of recipients developed a new hepatitis B infection after their transplant. Importantly, most of these infections were temporary and showed only low levels of the virus. However, the risk was much higher (16%) when all donors had detectable virus in their blood. The review also reported three deaths that were linked to hepatitis B transmission, all occurring in recipients who were not taking preventive antiviral drugs after their transplant.

This research combines information from existing studies, which means it shows patterns but cannot prove what causes specific outcomes. The findings suggest that with careful donor selection and preventive treatment, transplants from HBV-positive donors might be an option to expand the donor pool. However, the deaths highlight that skipping preventive medication carries serious risks. Patients should discuss these complex risks and benefits with their transplant team.

What this means for you:
Kidney transplants from hepatitis B-positive donors carry infection risk; preventive antiviral medication appears crucial for safety.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Potential kidney donors with active hepatitis B virus (HBV: positive hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] and/or nucleic acid test [NAT]) are usually declined for HBsAg-negative recipients. Safety may be improved by recipient vaccination and/or antivirals, thereby increasing transplantation opportunities. We quantified HBV transmission risk in this setting to inform donation decisions. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis (MEDLINE, to November 2024) of cohorts comprised of kidney donors with active HBV intentionally used for HBsAg-negative recipients. Transmission was defined as new HBsAg or NAT positivity posttransplant. Transmission proportions and exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using generalized linear mixed models with logistic transformation and random effects. RESULTS: We included 20 cohorts involving 600 HBsAg-negative recipients from donors with active HBV. Most donors were living (52%), with negative NAT (60%). Most recipients had positive surface antibody (>10 IU/L, 86%); many were core antibody positive (47%). Antiviral prophylaxis was given to 49% recipients, varying in type, duration, and strategy. There were 29 of 600 HBV transmissions, mostly transient low-level viremia only (62%). The pooled transmission rate was 4.0% (95% CI, 1.8%-8.3%) with low heterogeneity ( I2  = 0%) but some between-study variance (Tau 2  = 1.21). Transmission rates were higher where all donors had positive NAT (16.0%; 95% CI, 10.2%-24.3%), and lower where all recipients were living (0.8%; 95% CI, 0.1%-6.4%) or had positive surface antibody (1.4%; 95% CI, 0.2%-8.8%). Three deaths because of HBV transmissions occurred, all among recipients not taking posttransplant antiviral prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Given low transmission rates and mitigating strategies, kidney transplantation may be considered from donors with active HBV, with donor/recipient risk stratification, consent, and monitoring/prophylaxis.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.