Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds 4% HBV transmission risk in kidney transplants from active HBV donors

Meta-analysis finds 4% HBV transmission risk in kidney transplants from active HBV donors
Photo by Robina Weermeijer / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider donor NAT status and recipient immunity when evaluating HBV-positive donors for kidney transplantation.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission from donors with active HBV (positive HBsAg and/or nucleic acid test [NAT]) to HBsAg-negative kidney transplant recipients. The analysis included 20 cohorts involving 600 recipients, with most donors being living (52%) and having negative NAT (60%). Most recipients had positive surface antibody (>10 IU/L, 86%), and 49% received antiviral prophylaxis.

The pooled HBV transmission rate was 4.0% (95% CI, 1.8%-8.3%), representing 29 of 600 recipients. Most transmissions (62%) were transient low-level viremia only. However, transmission risk varied substantially by donor and recipient characteristics: it was 16.0% (95% CI, 10.2%-24.3%) when all donors had positive NAT, but only 0.8% (95% CI, 0.1%-6.4%) when all recipients were living donors and 1.4% (95% CI, 0.2%-8.8%) when all recipients had positive surface antibody.

Safety data were limited, but three deaths occurred because of HBV transmissions, all among recipients not taking posttransplant antiviral prophylaxis. The pooled estimate showed low heterogeneity (I² = 0%) but some between-study variance. Key limitations include the observational nature of the included studies, lack of reported follow-up duration, and incomplete reporting of antiviral prophylaxis regimens. The findings support risk-stratified consideration of such transplants with informed consent and appropriate monitoring and prophylaxis.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Potential kidney donors with active hepatitis B virus (HBV: positive hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] and/or nucleic acid test [NAT]) are usually declined for HBsAg-negative recipients. Safety may be improved by recipient vaccination and/or antivirals, thereby increasing transplantation opportunities. We quantified HBV transmission risk in this setting to inform donation decisions. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis (MEDLINE, to November 2024) of cohorts comprised of kidney donors with active HBV intentionally used for HBsAg-negative recipients. Transmission was defined as new HBsAg or NAT positivity posttransplant. Transmission proportions and exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using generalized linear mixed models with logistic transformation and random effects. RESULTS: We included 20 cohorts involving 600 HBsAg-negative recipients from donors with active HBV. Most donors were living (52%), with negative NAT (60%). Most recipients had positive surface antibody (>10 IU/L, 86%); many were core antibody positive (47%). Antiviral prophylaxis was given to 49% recipients, varying in type, duration, and strategy. There were 29 of 600 HBV transmissions, mostly transient low-level viremia only (62%). The pooled transmission rate was 4.0% (95% CI, 1.8%-8.3%) with low heterogeneity ( I2  = 0%) but some between-study variance (Tau 2  = 1.21). Transmission rates were higher where all donors had positive NAT (16.0%; 95% CI, 10.2%-24.3%), and lower where all recipients were living (0.8%; 95% CI, 0.1%-6.4%) or had positive surface antibody (1.4%; 95% CI, 0.2%-8.8%). Three deaths because of HBV transmissions occurred, all among recipients not taking posttransplant antiviral prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Given low transmission rates and mitigating strategies, kidney transplantation may be considered from donors with active HBV, with donor/recipient risk stratification, consent, and monitoring/prophylaxis.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.