Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Antenatal pelvic floor exercise reduces perineal laceration risk in primiparous women during vaginal delivery.

Antenatal pelvic floor exercise reduces perineal laceration risk in primiparous women during vaginal…
Photo by Ksenia Makagonova / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider antenatal pelvic floor exercise as the optimal first-line strategy to reduce perineal laceration risk in primiparous women.

This Bayesian network meta-analysis included 10,745 participants from high-resource settings across 15 countries. The study compared various physical interventions, including massage, warm compresses, exercise, lubrication, and education, against each other to assess their impact on perineal trauma during vaginal delivery in primiparous women with term singleton pregnancies.

For preventing overall perineal laceration, antenatal pelvic floor exercise ranked first with a relative risk of 0.50 (95%CrI 0.28–0.87). Massage combined with warm compresses ranked first for preventing episiotomy (RR = 0.53; 95%CrI 0.28–0.93). Additionally, massage demonstrated statistically significant superiority in promoting an intact perineum (RR = 1.93; 95%CrI 1.16–3.29). Education-only interventions showed no protective effects (RR = 1.03).

Regarding severe perineal pain reduction, warm compresses had the highest SUCRA probability of 74.51%. All physical interventions demonstrated excellent neonatal safety, with no reported adverse or serious adverse events. However, findings for pain outcomes are exploratory due to sparse network structures and wide credible intervals. Generalizability to multiparous women and low-resource environments requires further investigation.

Antenatal pelvic floor exercise represents the optimal first-line prevention strategy, offering a 50% risk reduction. For women without prior training, warm compresses and intrapartum massage provide effective alternatives. Clinicians should note that causality for pain outcomes remains uncertain and results may not apply outside the studied populations.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Perineal trauma during vaginal delivery affects most primiparous women, causing significant maternal morbidity including chronic pain, sexual dysfunction, and impaired quality of life. While various physical interventions have been proposed for prevention, their comparative effectiveness remains unclear due to limited head-to-head trials. This Bayesian network meta-analysis systematically compared the efficacy and safety of all available physical interventions for preventing perineal trauma during vaginal delivery. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials comparing physical interventions including massage, warm compresses, exercise, hands-on/off techniques, lubrication, education, or their combinations for perineal protection. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2.0. Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed using R Studio. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were calculated to rank interventions. Thirty-one randomized controlled trials involving 10,745 participants across 15 countries were included, of whom the majority were primiparous women with term singleton pregnancies enrolled in high-resource settings. For overall perineal laceration prevention, antenatal pelvic floor exercise ranked first (RR = 0.50, 95%CrI 0.28–0.87; SUCRA = 86.58%); for episiotomy prevention, massage combined with warm compresses ranked first (RR = 0.53, 95%CrI 0.28–0.93; SUCRA = 90.08%); for intact perineum promotion, massage demonstrated statistically significant superiority (RR = 1.93, 95%CrI 1.16–3.29); for severe perineal pain reduction, warm compresses had the highest SUCRA probability (SUCRA = 74.51%), though pain findings are exploratory given sparse network structures and wide credible intervals. All physical interventions demonstrated excellent neonatal safety. Education-only interventions showed no protective effects (RR = 1.03). Antenatal pelvic floor exercise represents the optimal first-line prevention strategy with 50% risk reduction. For women without prior training, warm compresses and intrapartum massage provide effective alternatives. Findings for pain outcomes should be interpreted as exploratory. Broader implementation of evidence-based physical interventions as evidence-informed strategies could help reduce the burden of perineal trauma, particularly among primiparous women in well-resourced settings, though generalizability to multiparous women and low-resource environments requires further investigation. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42025633266.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.