Home›Gastroenterology› Atezolizumab and bevacizumab plus TACE improves TACE-PFS to 11.30 months versus 7.03 months
Atezolizumab and bevacizumab plus TACE improves TACE-PFS to 11.30 months versus 7.03 monthsAdding two drugs to TACE improves progression-free survival
The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatologyPublished November 2, 2026Study authors: Kudo Masatoshi, Ogasawara Sadahisa, Liu Ruibao, Gu Shanzhi, Wang Kunyuan, Zhao Ming, Hu Hongtao, Liu…PubMed ↗NCT04712643 ↗DOI ↗Editorial oversight: Dr. Amelia Tan, PhD · Internal Medicine & Chronic Disease
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review.
How we work
Share
Key Takeaway
Consider adding atezolizumab and bevacizumab to TACE to improve TACE-PFS in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
This Phase 3 randomized trial enrolled 342 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, ECOG performance status 0-1, and Child-Pugh class A liver function. Patients were randomized to receive either on-demand TACE plus atezolizumab (1200 mg) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks, or on-demand TACE alone.
In the primary outcome of TACE-PFS, the combination therapy achieved a median of 11.30 months compared to 7.03 months in the TACE-alone group (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.92, p=0.0089). For overall survival, the results were 34.53 months versus 35.38 months (HR 0.96, 99.62% CI 0.58-1.58), which did not reach statistical significance.
Safety profiles showed that the combination therapy was associated with a 14% rate of decreased platelet count and 14% hypertension, while 13% experienced post-embolisation syndrome. The TACE-alone group had a 7% rate of decreased platelet count and 7% increased aspartate aminotransferase. No new safety signals were identified.
A primary limitation of this study is that the overall survival data is immature. The finding suggests that the addition of atezolizumab and bevacizumab to TACE significantly improves TACE-PFS, though its impact on overall survival remains uncertain due to the follow-up duration.
How this fits prior evidence
How this fits prior evidence: This finding addresses a gap in treatment options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma by demonstrating that adding atezolizumab and bevacizumab to TACE improves TACE-PFS. While prior coverage noted that antibiotic exposure is associated with shorter overall survival in HCC patients on ICIs, this trial provides specific data on the combination of TACE with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. The study does not address the role of periostin as a prognostic biomarker or the impact of hepatectomy plus splenectomy on survival.
Living with liver cancer, specifically hepatocellular carcinoma, requires treatments that can keep the disease from progressing. A large trial involving 342 patients looked at a common procedure called TACE. Researchers tested what happens when doctors add two specific medications, atezolizumab and bevacizumab, to this standard treatment.
The results showed that patients who received the combination of TACE and both drugs saw a significant improvement in progression-free survival. These patients stayed stable for about 11.3 months, compared to roughly 7 months for those who received TACE alone. This suggests the combination helps manage the growth of the cancer more effectively over time.
While the combination helped keep the cancer from progressing, the data on overall survival is still early and did not show a significant difference between the two groups. Safety checks showed some common side effects like high blood pressure and lower platelet counts in the combination group, but no new safety concerns were found. Because the follow-up period is still maturing, more time is needed to see the long-term impact on overall survival.
What this means for you:
Adding atezolizumab and bevacizumab to TACE helps liver cancer patients stay stable for a longer period of time.
Common questions
How does this treatment help patients with liver cancer?
Adding the drugs atezolizumab and bevacizumab to the TACE procedure helped patients stay stable for 11.3 months, compared to 7.03 months for those who only received TACE. This means the combination helped slow down the progression of the cancer for a longer period.
Is the combination of these drugs safe for patients?
The study found no new safety signals for the combination. Some patients experienced high blood pressure, lower platelet counts, or post-embolisation syndrome. These side effects occurred at similar rates in both the combination group and the group receiving TACE alone.
Does this treatment help people live longer?
The data on overall survival is still immature, meaning it is too early to tell. While the combination helped keep the cancer from progressing for a longer time, there was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups at the time of the study.
BACKGROUND: TACE is the standard treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma but has limited survival benefits. TALENTACE evaluated adding atezolizumab and bevacizumab to on-demand TACE versus on-demand TACE alone in patients with systemically untreated, intermediate-to-high tumour burden unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
METHODS: In this randomised, open-label, phase 3 study at 40 centres in China and Japan, patients aged 18 years or older with confirmed, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and an anticipated life expectancy of 12 months or more were eligible for inclusion. Eligible patients were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, Child-Pugh class A liver function, no previous systemic therapy, and a sum of tumour maximum diameter (cm) and lesion number of six or more based on the six-and-twelve score. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using a permuted-block method implemented via an interactive voice and web response system, to on-demand TACE plus atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks (initiated 14 days to 8 weeks after TACE), or on-demand TACE alone, with TACE administered at the investigators' discretion. The randomisation sequence was generated by an independent biostatistician at the system vendor and was concealed from the sponsor study team and investigators until randomisation; allocation was stratified by baseline α-fetoprotein, prior locoregional therapy, and baseline Vp1/2 (and geographic region in earlier protocol versions). Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed TACE progression-free survival (TACE-PFS; time from randomisation to untreatable [unTACEable] progression, TACE failure or refractoriness, or death), and overall survival, both analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Overall survival was assessed under a prespecified adaptive (group sequential) design comprising two interim analyses and one final analysis. Safety was evaluated in the as-treated population, defined as all randomised patients who received any study treatment, analysed according to the treatment received. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04712643) and is ongoing.
FINDINGS: Between Feb 23, 2021, and August 11, 2023, 342 patients were randomly assigned to TACE plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab (n=171) or on-demand TACE alone (n=171). Median age was 61·0 years (range 21·0-90·0), 66 (19%) of 342 participants were female, 276 (81%) were male, 308 (90%) were Chinese, and 34 (10%) were Japanese. The mean size of the largest target lesion per RECIST 1.1 was 7·7 cm (SD 4·3) in both arms. In the TACE plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab group, 36 (21%) of 171 patients were Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A, 100 (58%) were stage B, and 35 (20%) were stage C; in the TACE alone group, 42 (25%) of 171 patients were Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A, 105 (61%) were stage B, and 24 (14%) were stage C. At data cutoff (Feb 28, 2025; median follow-up 26·25 months [IQR 21·16-33·74]), median TACE-PFS was 11·30 months (95% CI 7·52-15·01) with TACE plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab versus 7·03 months (95% CI 5·32-8·41) with TACE alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [95% CI 0·55-0·92]; two-sided stratified log-rank p=0·0089). Overall survival remains immature and was assessed at the first of the prespecified interim analyses; median overall survival was 34·53 months (99·62% CI 24·80-not evaluable) in the TACE plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab group compared with 35·38 months (99·62% CI 24·74-not evaluable) in the TACE alone group (HR 0·96 [99·62% CI 0·58-1·58]). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the TACE plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab group were decreased platelet count (23 [14%] of 166), hypertension (23 [14%]), and post-embolisation syndrome (21 [13%]); in the TACE alone group, the most common were post-embolisation syndrome (23 [13%] of 173), decreased platelet count (12 [7%]), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (12 [7%]). The most common serious adverse event was ascites (eight [5%]) in the TACE plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab group and post-embolisation syndrome (six [3%]) in the TACE alone group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in five patients in the TACE plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab group (gastrointestinal haemorrhage, liver abscess, haemolytic anaemia, hypertension, and unknown death) and three patients in the TACE alone group (post-procedural haemorrhage, ascites, and unknown death). No new safety signals were identified.
INTERPRETATION: On-demand TACE plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab significantly improved TACE-PFS versus on-demand TACE alone. Overall survival follow-up is ongoing.
FUNDING: Shanghai Roche Pharmaceuticals.