Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Text reminders and letters increased FIT completion in overdue colorectal cancer screening patientsText reminders and letters boost colorectal cancer screening completion in primary care

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider text reminders and letters to increase FIT completion in overdue colorectal cancer screening patients.

This randomized trial was conducted in a primary care setting and enrolled 5244 patients aged 50 to 74 years who were overdue for colorectal cancer screening. The study population consisted of individuals identified as overdue for screening within the primary care system. The primary outcome measured was the proportion of patients who completed a fecal immunochemical test within 4 months of the intervention. The follow-up period for the study was 4 months. No serious adverse events or discontinuations were reported, and tolerability data were not reported. Funding or conflicts of interest were not reported.

The intervention group received a health system-branded blue box, text reminders, and a reminder letter. The comparator group received a standard envelope with no text reminders and no reminder letter. The text reminder component was compared against no text reminders, and the letter component was compared against no reminder letter. The health system-branded box component was evaluated separately to determine its impact on response rates.

For the primary outcome of FIT completion, the overall comparison between the box group and the envelope group showed no difference. The completion rate was 17.8% for the box group versus 18.0% for the envelope group. The effect size was -0.2%. The 95% confidence interval ranged from -2.3% to 1.9%, and the P value was .85. This indicates that the branded box alone did not increase screening completion.

When analyzing the text reminder component, completion of FIT was 21.2% in the text reminder group versus 14.6% in the no text group. The effect size was 6.6%. The 95% confidence interval was 4.6% to 8.7%, and the P value was less than .001. This demonstrates a statistically significant increase in screening completion associated with text reminders.

For the reminder letter component, completion of FIT was 20.3% in the reminder letter group versus 15.5% in the no reminder letter group. The effect size was 4.8%. The 95% confidence interval was 2.7% to 6.9%, and the P value was less than .001. This demonstrates a statistically significant increase in screening completion associated with mailed reminder letters.

Safety and tolerability findings were limited by the lack of reported data. Adverse events were not reported, serious adverse events were not reported, discontinuations were not reported, and tolerability was not reported. The study design was a randomized trial, which supports causal inference regarding the interventions tested. No methodological limitations were explicitly listed in the provided data.

These results suggest that behaviorally informed text messaging and mailed reminders significantly increase screening completion. The health system-branded box did not increase response rates. This contrasts with the strong positive effects seen with text and letter interventions. Prior landmark studies in colorectal cancer screening often highlight the difficulty of reaching overdue patients. This trial confirms that low-cost behavioral interventions can effectively bridge that gap.

Clinical implications suggest that primary care practices should prioritize text reminders and mailed letters to improve screening adherence. The lack of effect from the branded box implies that packaging alone is insufficient to change behavior. Questions remain unanswered regarding long-term adherence beyond the 4-month follow-up period and the cost-effectiveness of these interventions in different healthcare systems. The absence of reported safety data limits the ability to assess potential harms, though none were observed in this trial.

Colorectal cancer screening saves lives, yet many people in primary care do not get screened on time. This randomized trial looked at ways to help overdue patients aged 50 to 74 years complete a fecal immunochemical test, or FIT. The study involved 5,244 patients who were past due for screening. Researchers wanted to know if specific reminders would help more people get tested within four months. The results show that simple communication methods can make a real difference for patients waiting for screening.

The researchers compared three different approaches against a standard control group. The control group received a regular envelope with no text messages and no reminder letter. One group received a health system-branded blue box. Another group received text message reminders. A third group received a reminder letter. The main goal was to see how many people completed the FIT within four months of being contacted.

The findings revealed clear differences between the methods. Patients who received text messages had a 21.2 percent completion rate compared to 14.6 percent for those who received no text reminders. This represents an increase of 6.6 percent. Patients who received a reminder letter had a 20.3 percent completion rate compared to 15.5 percent for those who received no letter. This represents an increase of 4.8 percent. Both of these increases were statistically significant. In contrast, the health system-branded blue box did not increase response rates. The completion rate for the blue box group was 17.8 percent, which was very close to the 18.0 percent rate of the standard envelope group. The difference was not statistically significant.

No safety concerns were reported in this study. There were no adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or tolerability issues to note. The interventions were simple communications that did not carry medical risks. Patients could feel safe using these reminder methods without worry about side effects or harm.

It is important to remember that this is a single randomized trial. While the results are positive for text messages and letters, one study cannot change all medical practice on its own. The study was conducted in a primary care setting with a specific group of patients. Other settings or patient populations might respond differently. The lack of effect from the branded box suggests that the physical appearance of the mail may not be as important as the message content. Patients should not assume that a fancy box will help them get screened if a simple letter or text works better.

For patients right now, this study suggests that asking for text reminders or letters from their doctor's office could help them get screened sooner. The evidence supports using these low-cost communication tools to improve screening rates. Patients who are overdue for screening should talk to their primary care team about setting up these reminders. Simple steps like this can help close the gap in screening and protect health.

What this means for you:
Text reminders and letters significantly increased colorectal cancer screening completion in this trial.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 5,244
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up888.0 mo
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) can boost colorectal cancer screening (CRC) rates, but response rates remain limited. We evaluated if behavioral interventions increased response rates. METHODS: This pragmatic randomized trial with a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design included primary care patients aged 50 to 74 years who were overdue for CRC screening. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive a health system-branded blue box or a standard envelope. Patients were concurrently randomized 1:1 to receive or not receive text reminders. Patients were also concurrently randomized 1:1 to receive a reminder letter. The primary outcome was the proportion who completed a FIT within 4 months. RESULTS: Among 5244 patients included, the mean age was 59.6 years (standard deviation [SD], 7.3 years); 35.8% were Black and 53% were White. At 4 months, 17.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.3%-19.2%) who received the box, compared with 18.0% (95% CI, 16.5%-19.5%) who received the standard envelope, completed FIT, an absolute difference of -0.2% (95% CI, -2.3 to 1.9%; P = .85). Among those who received text messaging, 21.2% (95% CI, 19.6%-22.8%) completed FIT compared with 14.6% (95% CI, 13.2%-15.9%) of those who did not, an absolute difference of 6.6% (95% CI, 4.6%-8.7%; P < .001). Among those that received the mailed reminder, 20.3% (95% CI, 18.7%-21.8%) completed FIT compared with 15.5% (95% CI, 14.1%-16.9%) of those who did not, an absolute difference of 4.8% (95% CI, 2.7%-6.9%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Behaviorally informed text messaging and mailed reminders significantly increased screening completion, but the health system-branded box did not increase response rates. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Number: NCT05341622.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.