Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Advance care planning documentation associated with lower life-sustaining treatment and higher hospice enrollment in older US adults.

Advance care planning documentation associated with lower life-sustaining treatment and higher hospi…
Photo by Vitaly Gariev / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that advance care planning documentation associates with lower life-sustaining treatment and higher hospice enrollment, but associations are not causal.

This observational study analyzed data from the Health and Retirement Study exit interviews involving 5,622 decedents representing 23.2 million individuals in the United States. The analysis categorized advance care planning documentation into none, one document (living will or durable power of attorney), or two documents (both). The primary focus was on associations with end-of-life care outcomes, including intensive care unit use, life-sustaining treatment, hospice enrollment, and out-of-hospital death.

Results indicated that having any documentation was associated with a lower likelihood of life-sustaining treatment (aRR=0.85; 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.98) and a higher likelihood of hospice enrollment (aRR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.60) and out-of-hospital death (aRR=1.11; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.18). No association was found between documentation and ICU use. The incremental benefits of having two documents versus one were modest.

Associations were stronger among decedents with expected death and attenuated among those with unexpected death. This study used adjusted risk ratios to assess relationships, noting that associations were reported rather than causation. No safety data or adverse events were reported. These findings suggest that documentation within care planning processes is linked to specific end-of-life care patterns, though observational design limits causal inference.

Study Details

EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Background: Advance care planning (ACP) documentation, including living wills and durable power of attorney (DPOA), is intended to support goal concordant end of life care. However, it is unknown if comprehensive documentation confers additional benefits, and how these associations vary across clinical contexts. Methods: We used 2010 to 2022 Health and Retirement Study exit interview data to examine associations between ACP documentation and end of life care among U.S. adults aged 50 years and older. Documentation was categorized as none, one document (living will or DPOA), or two documents (both). Outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) use, life sustaining treatment, hospice enrollment, and out-of-hospital death. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs), and temporal trends in documentation were assessed using joinpoint regression. Results: Among 5,622 decedents representing 23.2 million individuals, 42.7% had two documents and 28.9% had none, documentation increased substantially around 2014. Compared with no documentation, having any documentation was associated with lower likelihood of life-sustaining treatment (aRR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.98) and higher likelihood of hospice enrollment (aRR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.60) and out-of-hospital death (aRR=1.11, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.18), but not ICU use. Having two documents showed similar patterns, with modest differences compared with one document after adjustment. Associations were stronger among decedents with expected death and attenuated among those with unexpected death. Conclusions: Comprehensive ACP documentation is associated with less aggressive end of life care and greater hospice use, though the incremental benefits of two documents are modest. Findings highlight the importance of documentation within care planning processes and the clinical context.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.