This is a case report of one adult patient with stage IV, relapsed/refractory anaplastic lymphoma kinase–positive large B-cell lymphoma (ALK+ LBCL) who had progressed through four prior lines of therapy. The patient received off-label nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, as a subsequent treatment. No comparator group was reported.
The main finding was a rapid clinical and radiological response observed after two cycles of nivolumab. The report describes sustained clinical benefit after 16 cycles of treatment. No specific effect sizes, absolute numbers, or statistical analyses were provided. The authors reported an association, not causation.
Regarding safety, no adverse events were reported. Serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability details were not reported. The primary limitation is that this is a single case report, which provides very low-certainty evidence. Generalizability, causality, and definitive efficacy cannot be established from this isolated observation.
The practice relevance is highly restrained. The authors suggest PD-L1 testing and repeat biopsy at progression may offer insights for guiding therapy in similar cases. This report generates a hypothesis for future research but does not support clinical practice changes. Controlled trials are needed to assess the role of PD-1 blockade in this rare lymphoma subtype.
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundAnaplastic lymphoma kinase–positive large B-cell lymphoma (ALK+ LBCL) is an exceedingly rare and aggressive subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, comprising less than 1% of all LBCL cases. These tumors often exhibit resistance to standard chemoimmunotherapy and targeted approaches, resulting in poor clinical outcomes and a median overall survival of approximately 20 months. Despite the identification of ALK rearrangements and activating mutations, effective treatment strategies remain elusive.Case presentationWe report a case of an adult diagnosed with stage IV ALK+ LBCL, confirmed via lymph node biopsy and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) demonstrating ALK rearrangement in 91% of nuclei. The patient progressed through four lines of therapy, including R-CHOP, alectinib, lorlatinib with involved-field radiation, and brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine. Comprehensive genomic profiling revealed a CLTC-ALK fusion and two ALK gain-of-function mutations (p.L1196M and p.G1202R), which are typically sensitive to lorlatinib, suggesting ALK-independent resistance mechanisms. Repeat biopsy demonstrated 20%–30% PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. With no standard options remaining, the patient elected to receive off-label nivolumab. Remarkably, despite an initial disease flare, a rapid clinical and radiological response was observed after just two cycles. As of the latest follow-up after 16 cycles, the patient remains on treatment with sustained clinical benefit and no adverse events reported.DiscussionThis case highlights the therapeutic challenges of ALK+ LBCL, including its refractoriness to both standard chemotherapy and ALK inhibitors, even in the presence of targetable mutations. The exceptional response to PD-1 blockade, possibly facilitated by acquired PD-L1 expression and an inflammatory tumor microenvironment, suggests an immunologically active tumor niche. Comparison with prior cases supports the hypothesis that PD-L1 expression, even at moderate levels, may predict responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors in this rare lymphoma subtype.ConclusionThis case underscores the potential of immune checkpoint inhibition in ALK+ LBCL, particularly in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. PD-L1 testing and repeat biopsy at progression may offer critical insights for guiding therapy. Prospective studies are warranted to explore checkpoint blockade alone or in combination with targeted agents in this aggressive lymphoma.