Gene therapy reduces bleeding rates and factor use in adults with severe hemophilia A
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy and safety of gene therapy (valoctocogene roxaparvovec, giroctocogene fitelparvovec, dirloctocogene samoparvovec) versus factor VIII or emicizumab prophylaxis in adults with severe/moderately severe hemophilia A. The analysis found gene therapy reduced annualized bleeding rates compared to factor VIII prophylaxis (standardized mean difference -0.72, 95% CI: -0.96 to -0.48; p < 0.00001). Mean FVIII activity rose to 8.3-67.5 IU/dL in year 1 but declined over follow-up, and factor VIII prophylaxis use decreased by >96% by year 4. Return to prophylaxis after gene therapy ranged from 0%-33% across studies.
Adverse events were common but mostly mild to moderate, with transient liver enzyme elevations being particularly notable and managed with corticosteroids. The risk of bias across included studies was moderate, and key limitations include uncertainty about the durability of FVIII expression and the need for further investigation of long-term safety.
For clinical practice, this evidence suggests gene therapy may offer meaningful reductions in bleeding and treatment burden for people with hemophilia A. However, clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously given the moderate risk of bias and the unknown long-term durability and safety profile of these interventions.