Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

FMT and SDD show efficacy for CRE decolonisation in meta-analysis of 872 participants

FMT and SDD show efficacy for CRE decolonisation in meta-analysis of 872 participants
Photo by ClinicalPulse / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider FMT and SDD for CRE decolonisation but note limited evidence and potential resistance risks.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy and safety of decolonisation protocols for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) across 16 studies involving 872 participants. The interventions studied were faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and selective digestive decontamination (SDD), compared against various control groups. The primary outcome was clearance of CRE and VRE, with follow-up at approximately 1 month.

For FMT, clearance of CRE was significantly improved with a risk ratio (RR) of 2.01 (95% CI: 1.27-3.18). Clearance of VRE with FMT was also significantly improved with an RR of 2.96 (95% CI: 1.60-5.47). For SDD, clearance of CRE was significantly increased with an RR of 2.47 (95% CI: 1.32-4.63), while clearance of VRE with SDD was not significant (RR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.70-3.30). Absolute numbers for these outcomes were not reported.

Adverse events with these interventions were generally mild, though serious adverse events, discontinuation rates, and tolerability details were not reported. The analysis noted low to moderate heterogeneity across studies. Several studies reported that SDD was associated with increased antimicrobial resistance, and the durability of SDD effects appears limited. Key limitations include the observational nature of most included studies, which precludes definitive causal conclusions, and the short follow-up period of approximately 1 month.

These findings suggest that both FMT and SDD may offer approaches to decolonisation of multidrug-resistant organisms, particularly for CRE. However, clinicians should interpret these results cautiously given the evidence heterogeneity, potential for antimicrobial resistance development with SDD, and need for longer-term efficacy and safety data. The analysis supports further investigation in controlled trials.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 872
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up1.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Rises in the prevalence of multi-drug-resistant organisms threaten patient safety globally. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VREs) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are linked with prolonged hospitalisation, treatment failure, and increased mortality. Decolonisation strategies could reduce transmission and improve outcomes, but their efficacy and safety remain uncertain. This study systematically evaluates decolonisation protocols for VRE and CRE through a meta-analysis. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on studies using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies evaluating decolonisation protocols for VRE and CRE were included. Papers were assessed for risk of bias using the Risk of Bias 2 tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan, Cochrane, London, United Kingdom. RESULTS: Sixteen studies with a total of 872 participants were included for meta-analysis. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) significantly improved clearance of CRE (risk ratio [RR]: 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-3.18) and VRE (RR: 2.96, 95% CI: 1.60-5.47) compared with controls, with low to moderate heterogeneity. Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) significantly increased clearance of CRE (RR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.32-4.63), but not VRE (RR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.70-3.30). Adverse events were generally mild, but SDD was associated with increased antimicrobial resistance in several studies. CONCLUSIONS: FMT and SDD are promising interventions for CRE decolonisation, with FMT also showing benefit in VRE. The durability of SDD effects appears limited, with significant risk of promoting resistance. Future studies should standardise endpoints, evaluate combination approaches, and explore bacteriophage therapy. We suggest implementing uniform terminology with 'provisional clearance' as a descriptor for eradication at 1 month post intervention and 'enduring clearance' following continuous eradication for 6 months.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.