Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Tegoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy matches quadruple efficacy with fewer adverse eventsTegoprazan dual therapy matches standard H. pylori treatment

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider tegoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy as a safer but similarly effective alternative to bismuth quadruple therapy, though eradication rates remain suboptimal.

This systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis evaluated tegoprazan-amoxicillin (TA) dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in adults. The analysis included 1909 patients and compared TA with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) and proton pump inhibitor-based high-dose dual therapy (PPI-HDDT). The primary outcome was H. pylori eradication rate; secondary outcomes included adverse events and medication adherence.

For the eradication rate, TA and BQT showed no significant difference in intention-to-treat analysis (78.0% vs. 81.4%, RR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.88-1.05, p=0.44) and per-protocol analysis (84.6% vs. 86.2%, RR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.87-1.06, p=0.39). TA was also comparable to PPI-HDDT in efficacy and safety, though specific effect estimates were not reported.

Adverse events were significantly lower with TA compared with BQT (11.3% vs. 22.5%, RR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.67, p<0.00001). Medication adherence was similar between TA and BQT (95.7% vs. 94.5%, RR=1.01, 95% CI: 0.99-1.03, p=0.31).

The authors noted that the eradication rate comparison (TA vs. BQT) was based on low-quality evidence, while adverse events and adherence were moderate-quality evidence. They also emphasized that overall eradication efficacy is suboptimal, suggesting that TA may not achieve adequate eradication rates in all settings.

Clinically, TA dual therapy offers a simplified regimen with a better safety profile than BQT, but its comparable efficacy and suboptimal eradication rates warrant caution. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings and identify optimal patient selection.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis extends prior coverage on H. pylori therapies by evaluating tegoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, in dual therapy. It confirms the safety advantage of dual therapy over bismuth quadruple therapy, consistent with prior coverage that vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy is a safe alternative. However, it contrasts with prior coverage that bismuth quadruple and concomitant regimens achieve >85% eradication, as TA's eradication rate was lower (78.0% ITT). It also addresses a gap by comparing TA with PPI-HDDT, showing comparable efficacy, but does not address resistance mutations, a key driver of treatment failure noted in prior coverage.

A new review of studies looked at a simpler treatment for Helicobacter pylori, a common stomach infection that can lead to ulcers. The treatment, called tegoprazan-amoxicillin (TA) dual therapy, combines two medicines. The review compared it to the standard bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT), which uses four medicines, and to another dual therapy using a proton pump inhibitor.

The review included 1,909 adults with H. pylori. It found that TA dual therapy eradicated the infection about as often as BQT: 78.0% versus 81.4% in one analysis, and 84.6% versus 86.2% in another. These differences were not statistically significant, meaning the treatments worked similarly.

However, TA dual therapy had a clear advantage in side effects. Only 11.3% of people taking TA reported adverse events, compared to 22.5% of those taking BQT. That is about half the risk. Medication adherence was similar between the two groups, around 95%.

The review also found TA dual therapy was comparable to another dual therapy using a proton pump inhibitor. But the evidence for the eradication rate comparison was low-quality, so the results should be interpreted with caution.

Overall, TA dual therapy appears to be a good option that is simpler and easier to tolerate than the standard four-drug regimen. However, eradication rates were still below ideal, so it may not be the best choice for everyone. Talk to your doctor about the best treatment for your situation.

What this means for you:
A simpler two-drug H. pylori treatment works as well as standard therapy with fewer side effects, but eradication rates are still suboptimal.

Common questions

What is tegoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy?

It is a treatment for H. pylori infection that combines two medicines: tegoprazan, which reduces stomach acid, and the antibiotic amoxicillin. It is simpler than the standard four-drug regimen, which includes bismuth and a proton pump inhibitor.

Does tegoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy have fewer side effects?

Yes. Adverse events occurred in 11.3% of people taking tegoprazan-amoxicillin, compared to 22.5% of those taking bismuth-containing quadruple therapy. That is about half the risk, suggesting a better safety profile.

Who might benefit from tegoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy?

Adults with H. pylori infection who want a simpler treatment with fewer side effects might benefit. However, eradication rates are still suboptimal, so it may not be the best choice for everyone. Talk to your doctor to see if it is right for you.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance undermines conventional Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapies. Tegoprazan-amoxicillin (TA) dual therapy is a promising alternative, but its efficacy and safety compared with other treatment regimens remain unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of TA dual therapy in eradicating H. pylori. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched from inception to December 2025. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared TA dual therapy with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) or proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based high-dose dual therapy (PPI-HDDT) in adults with H. pylori infection. The outcomes were H. pylori eradication rate, adverse events, and medication adherence. Evidence quality was assessed via GRADE. RESULTS: Six RCTs (n = 1909) were included. TA dual therapy showed no significant difference in eradication rate compared with BQT (n = 5 RCTs, ITT analysis: 78.0% vs. 81.4%, RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.88-1.05, p = 0.44; PP analysis: 84.6% vs. 86.2%, RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87-1.06, p = 0.39; low-quality evidence), confirmed by trial sequential analysis. TA dual therapy had a lower overall adverse event rate (11.3% vs. 22.5%, RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.67, p < 0.00001; moderate-quality evidence) but similar adherence (95.7% vs. 94.5%, RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99-1.03, p = 0.31; moderate-quality evidence) compared with BQT. Efficacy and safety were comparable between TA dual therapy and PPI-HDDT (n = 1 RCT). CONCLUSIONS: The TA dual therapy exhibits similar efficacy compared with BQT and PPI-HDDT for H. pylori eradication, with a better safety profile compared with BQT. However, its overall eradication efficacy is suboptimal, necessitating further regimen optimization in the future.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.