Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Favipiravir PEP shows non-significant reduction in SARS-CoV-2 infection among household contacts in Thailand trial

Favipiravir PEP shows non-significant reduction in SARS-CoV-2 infection among household contacts in …
Photo by pina messina / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider favipiravir PEP findings preliminary; infection reduction was not statistically significant in this phase 2/3 trial.

This phase 2/3 cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluated favipiravir post-exposure prophylaxis (FPV-PEP) for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among household contacts in Thailand. The study included 168 close contacts from 76 index cases, comparing FPV-PEP (1600-2000 mg/day for 7 days) against usual care. The primary outcome was incidence of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Results showed a lower incidence of infection in the FPV-PEP group (7.32%) compared to usual care (14.47%), though this difference did not reach statistical significance. Secondary outcomes suggested less frequent symptom development (fever, rhinorrhea, myalgia), a higher probability of remaining asymptomatic, and delayed symptom onset among FPV-PEP recipients, though exact numbers for these outcomes were not reported.

No participants developed severe COVID-19 or required hospitalization. The study had several limitations: it was open-label, the primary outcome difference was not statistically significant, and it was a phase 2/3 trial. Key details including follow-up duration, adverse events, and funding sources were not reported.

For clinical practice, these findings represent early evidence that requires confirmation. The observed association between FPV-PEP and reduced infection/symptoms should be interpreted cautiously given the non-significant primary outcome and open-label design.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 remains a key driver of community spread, with secondary attack rates in Thai households reaching approximately 50 %. There is limited evidence supporting the efficacy of antiviral post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in this context. METHODS: The phase 2/3, open-label, (1:1) cluster-randomized controlled trial in Thailand, 168 household close contacts from 76 index cases were enrolled to receive either favipiravir-PEP (FPV-PEP) (1600-2000 mg/day for 7 days) or usual care. The efficacy of FPV-PEP was investigated in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection after contact with index cases. RESULTS: The incidence of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection was lower in the FPV-PEP group than in the usual care group (7.32 % vs. 14.47 %), although the difference was not statistically significant. A trend toward fewer early positive rapid diagnostic test results on day 3 was observed in the FPV-PEP group. Symptom development was less frequent among FPV-PEP recipients, with fewer cases of fever, rhinorrhea, and myalgia. A significantly higher probability of remaining asymptomatic and delayed symptom onset was observed in the FPV-PEP group. No participants developed severe COVID-19 or required hospitalization. CONCLUSION: FPV-PEP was associated with a lower incidence of fever, rhinorrhea, and myalgia among household contacts. While a reduction in secondary transmission was observed, it did not reach statistical significance. Further large-scale studies are warranted to clarify its role in preventing household transmission.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.