Antibiotic therapy versus appendectomy showed no difference in one-year complication rates for adults with imaging-confirmed acute appendicitis.
This review article summarizes an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials involving 2,101 adult patients with imaging-confirmed acute appendicitis. The analysis compared initial antibiotic therapy against appendectomy as the primary management strategies. The primary outcome assessed was the overall complication rate at one year, alongside secondary outcomes including the rate of step-up appendectomy, hospital length of stay, and time away from work.
The results indicated no significant difference in overall complication rates between the antibiotic therapy group and the appendectomy group. Specifically, 34% of patients in the antibiotic group required delayed appendectomy within one year. Among those requiring delayed surgery, 25% were found to have complicated appendicitis. Hospital length of stay and time away from work were also evaluated as secondary metrics of treatment impact.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported in the provided evidence. A critical limitation identified was the presence of an appendicolith. Patients with an appendicolith experienced significantly higher complication rates compared to those without. In this specific subgroup, 49% of patients required subsequent appendectomy, suggesting a higher risk of treatment failure with antibiotic therapy alone.
The practice relevance suggests that antibiotic therapy is a reasonable initial management strategy for adults with uncomplicated, imaging-confirmed acute appendicitis, provided patients understand the associated risks. Caution is warranted for those with an appendicolith due to the increased risk of complications and potential treatment failure observed in the study data.