Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

AZD7442 showed no benefit over placebo and increased rehospitalization risk in hospitalized COVID-19 adults.

AZD7442 showed no benefit over placebo and increased rehospitalization risk in hospitalized COVID-19…
Photo by Nathan Rimoux / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that AZD7442 increased rehospitalization risk without primary efficacy benefit in this trial.

This Phase 3 randomized, multicentre trial assessed the efficacy and safety of tixagevimab-cilgavimab (AZD7442) compared with placebo in 237 hospitalized adults with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either AZD7442 or placebo, with follow-up extending to 15.0 months (day 456). The study population included 127 participants in the AZD7442 group and 110 in the placebo group.

Regarding the primary outcome, no significant difference was observed on the 7-point ordinal scale on day 15 between the treatment and placebo groups (OR = 0.93; p = 0.81; CI [0.54-1.61]). Analysis of rehospitalization between discharge and day 456 in the global modified intention-to-treat population revealed significantly more rehospitalizations among participants who received AZD7442 (OR = 2.04; p = 0.04; CI [1.03-4.05]). However, no significant difference was found in the antigen-positive modified intention-to-treat population (OR = 1.78; p = 0.15; CI [0.80-3.94]). No significant differences were observed for mortality, SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, or adverse events.

Pharmacokinetic analyses indicated that serum drug concentrations were detectable up to day 365 for all sampled participants. Neutralizing antibody titres were significantly higher in the AZD7442 group up to day 180. Regarding treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies, 12 of 87 participants (13.8%) in the AZD7442 group developed them versus 5 of 69 (7.2%) in the placebo group (OR = 2.02; p = 0.21; CI [0.66-6.14]). The drug was considered safe up to 15 months with no significant differences in adverse events or discontinuations reported.

Key limitations include the small sample size and lack of reported data on mortality and reinfection specifics. Given the increased rehospitalization risk and lack of primary efficacy, the clinical relevance of using AZD7442 in this setting is questionable.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 127
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up15.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVES: To report long-term clinical efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and seroneutralization results of AZD7442 (monoclonal antibodies tixagevimab-cilgavimab) in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized, multicentre trial, hospitalized adults with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive AZD7442 or placebo, and followed-up until day 456, with repeated blood sample collections until day 365. Clinical endpoints included clinical status, mortality, rehospitalization, SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, and adverse events. Antidrug antibodies and serum drug concentrations were measured. Analyses were performed on the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) populations, defined as participants who actually received the intervention. RESULTS: Between April 28, 2021, and June 23, 2022, 237 participants were randomly assigned to AZD7442 (n = 127) or placebo (n = 110), and 123 participants actually received AZD7442. Participants were infected with pre-Omicron variants in 58.8% (133/226) of cases, versus 33.2% (75/226) of Omicron BA1, BA2, or BA5, and 8% (18/226) missing data. There was no significant difference in the distribution of the 7-point ordinal scale between the AZD7442 and placebo groups, either on day 15 (primary endpoint) (OR = 0.93 [0.54-1.61], p 0.81), or any other time point. Significantly more rehospitalizations occurred between discharge and day 456 among participants who received AZD7442 in the global mITT population (OR = 2.04 [1.03-4.05], p 0.04), but not in the antigen-positive mITT population (OR = 1.78 [0.80-3.94], p 0.15). No significant differences were observed in mortality, SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, or adverse events. In the AZD7442 group, 12 of 87 participants (13.8%) had treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies versus 5 of 69 (7.2%) in the placebo group (OR = 2.02 [0.66-6.14], p 0.21). Serum drug concentrations were detectable up to day 365 for all sampled participants (35/35). Neutralizing antibody titres were significantly higher in the AZD7442 group up to day 180. CONCLUSIONS: AZD7442 did not demonstrate any clinical benefit and was safe up to 15 months. This study also provides valuable data on the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and neutralizing activity of AZD7442 in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.