This cross-sectional study evaluated 585 individuals aged 1 to 91 years residing in five Ugandan villages approximately 5 km from Lake Victoria. The population included residents engaging in routine, short-range travel to the highly endemic lake, with varying frequencies of travel, activity types, and water contact durations. The primary outcome was infection status, assessed against a comparator group with no lake activity.
Structural causal models estimated the total and direct effects of exposure on infection. Daily lake travel was associated with a 1.7-fold increase in the odds of infection. Occupational activities were associated with a 3.4-fold increase in the odds of infection. Among moderate-frequency travelers, removing lake contact duration most effectively reduced infection risk, whereas daily travelers showed smaller changes in risk reduction. Some transmission persisted among individuals with little or no lake contact, indicating ongoing community spread.
The study did not report specific adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or tolerability data, as no medications were administered. A key limitation is that guidance on managing transmission to maintain Elimination of Prevalent Infection (EPHI) or move toward Interruption of Transmission (IoT) is limited, partly due to insufficient evidence on drivers of resurgence. Modifying lake contact behaviors could reduce individual infection risk, but the population-level impact of such modifications was limited.
The practice relevance underscores that targeting only high-risk villages or individual behaviors is unlikely to achieve sustained, wide-spread IoT. Integrated control strategies are needed that account for mobility, behavior, and local transmission ecology to effectively sustain elimination goals in these settings.
View Original Abstract ↓
Background/aims The World Health Organization (WHO) aims to eliminate schistosomiasis as a public health problem (EPHP) across 78 endemic countries by 2030. However, for low-prevalence settings that reach EPHP, guidance on managing transmission to maintain EPHP or move towards Interruption of Transmission (IoT) is limited, partly due to insufficient evidence on drivers of resurgence. In Uganda, some communities inland from Lake Victoria have achieved EPHP for Schistosoma mansoni but not progressed to IoT. This study explored whether routine, short-range travel to the highly endemic lake could sustain transmission in these settings. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study in five Ugandan villages ~5 km from Lake Victoria. Parasitological data were collected using Kato-Katz and Point-of-Care Circulating Cathodic Antigen tests, alongside questionnaires on lake travel from 585 individuals aged 1-91 years. A structural causal model estimated the total and direct effects of travel frequency, activity type, water contact duration, and drug treatment history on infection. Bayesian regression models and counterfactual simulations predicted infection under hypothetical interventions. Results Reaching IoT in low-risk villages may be undermined by habitual, short-range travel to high-risk sites, driven by the nature and duration of lake contact. Daily lake travel caused a 1.7-fold increase in odds of infection, while occupational activities caused a 3.4-fold increase compared with no lake activity. Counterfactual analysis showed that removing lake contact duration most reduced infection risk among moderate-frequency travellers, while daily travellers showed smaller changes, and some transmission persisted among individuals with little or no lake contact. Simulations demonstrated that modifying lake contact behaviours could reduce individual infection risk but had limited population-level impact. Conclusion These findings indicate that targeting only high-risk villages or individual behaviours is unlikely to achieve sustained, wide-spread IoT, underscoring the need for integrated control strategies that account for mobility, behaviour, and local transmission ecology.