Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Social media and prior study contacts yield higher retention than partner-seeking apps for HIV preventionSocial media helps keep people engaged in HIV prevention programs

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that social media and prior study contacts yield significantly higher retention than partner-seeking apps in HIV trials.

This secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial evaluated the impact of different recruitment sources on participant retention within a digital HIV prevention intervention. The study population consisted of 750 participants, specifically young Black and Latino men who have sex with men (YBLMT) and transgender women who have sex with men. The primary objective was to determine if the platform used to recruit participants influenced their ability to remain engaged in the mobile health trial over a 12-month follow-up period.

The study compared four distinct recruitment sources: social media, prior study contacts, partner-seeking apps, and other sources. Retention was defined as completing at least 3 of 4 follow-up surveys over the 12-month duration. The intervention was a digital HIV prevention program delivered via mobile technology to reach high-risk populations.

Primary outcome results indicated significant differences in retention based on recruitment source (Chi-square = 36.62; p <.001). Retention rates were highest among those recruited through social media (184/202, 91.1%) and prior study contacts (103/118, 87.3%). In contrast, retention was lower for participants recruited via partner-seeking apps (288/394, 73.1%) and other sources (23/36, 63.9%).

Adjusted odds ratios further clarified these differences after controlling for demographic variables. Participants recruited via social media had significantly higher odds of retention compared to those from partner-seeking apps (aOR 2.80; 95% CI 1.51-5.18). Similarly, participants from prior study contacts showed higher odds of retention than those from partner-seeking apps (aOR 2.11; 95% CI 1.14-3.92).

Secondary outcomes included the impact of demographic factors on retention. The data indicated that HIV-positive status was associated with lower retention (aOR 0.64). Additionally, a gender-diverse identity was associated with lower retention (aOR 0.38). These findings suggest that certain subgroups may face higher barriers to sustained engagement in digital health platforms.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported for this study. No specific adverse events or discontinuation rates were provided in the analysis. The methodology included a SMOTE-adjusted model, which reduced overall accuracy from 77.3% to 64.7%. This indicates some complexity in the predictive modeling used during the secondary analysis.

These results provide evidence that recruitment strategy is not just a matter of reach but also influences the quality and duration of participant engagement. While previous studies have established the utility of mobile health for HIV prevention, this study highlights how specific channels like social media may foster more stable long-term participation than app-based recruitment. Clinical implications suggest that researchers and providers should consider the recruitment channel when designing longitudinal digital interventions to optimize retention. Social media and existing research networks appear more robust for maintaining engagement than partner-seeking apps in this population. However, questions remain regarding why specific demographics, such as those with gender-diverse identities or HIV-positive status, experienced lower retention rates, and what specific modifications could improve their engagement.

When it comes to preventing HIV, staying connected to health programs is vital. For many people, especially those in high-risk groups, a program only works if they stay involved over time. If a person stops responding or leaves a study early, they might lose access to important information and support. This research looked at how different ways of finding participants affect their willingness to stay in the program.

Researchers looked at 750 people, including young Black and Latino men who have sex with men and transgender women who have sex with men. They wanted to see if where a person first heard about the study influenced whether they stayed involved for at least one year. To do this, they compared four different ways of finding participants: social media, prior study contacts, partner-seeking apps, and other sources.

The results showed that how someone joined the program mattered significantly. People who were reached through social media or through previous study contacts had much higher rates of staying in the program compared to those found through partner-seeking apps or other sources. Specifically, about 91% of people from social media stayed involved, while only about 73% of those from partner-seeking apps did. Even after looking at different personal backgrounds, people from social media were nearly three times more likely to stay in the program than those from dating apps.

While this study provides helpful insights into how to reach people, there are important things to keep in mind. This was a secondary analysis of an existing trial, meaning it looked back at data already collected rather than starting a brand-new experiment. Additionally, the researchers noted that some specific groups, such as those who were already HIV-positive or identified as gender-diverse, had lower rates of staying in the program regardless of how they joined. This suggests that while social media is a strong tool for engagement, other factors also play a big role.

For healthcare providers and community organizers, this means that where we choose to advertise programs can change who stays and who drops out. Using social media might be a more reliable way to build long-term connections with people seeking HIV prevention. However, it is not a magic fix for everyone; researchers still need to find better ways to keep all participants engaged, especially those in groups that currently show lower retention rates.

What this means for you:
Social media and prior contacts are more effective at keeping people engaged in long-term HIV prevention programs.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 750
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up348.0 mo
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Young Black and Latino men who have sex with men and transgender women who have sex with men (YBLMT) experience disproportionate HIV-related health disparities in the United States. Digital health interventions offer scalable HIV prevention and support services for these populations. However, recruitment strategies may influence both sample demographics and participant retention, which is critical for intervention effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether recruitment source was associated with retention in a mobile health randomized controlled trial and assessed demographic differences across recruitment platforms. METHODS: Data were drawn from the HealthMpowerment (HMP) 2.0 randomized controlled trial (N=750; July 2020 to September 2022). Participants aged 15 to 29 years were recruited through 4 sources: social media advertisements (n=202), partner-seeking apps (n=394), prior study contacts (n=118), and other sources (eg, community outreach, peer referrals; n=36). Retention was defined as completing at least 3 of 4 follow-up surveys over 12 months, equivalent to completing at least 80% (n=4) of all 5 study measurement occasions, consistent with the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria for cohort study follow-up. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests assessed unadjusted retention differences across recruitment sources. Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, HIV status, race, ethnicity, and gender identity estimated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for the association between recruitment source and retention. A sensitivity analysis requiring completion of all 4 follow-up surveys was also conducted. A predictive logistic regression model incorporating Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to address class imbalance further explored demographic and recruitment predictors of retention. RESULTS: Recruitment source was significantly associated with retention (²=36.62; <.001). Participants recruited via social media (184/202, 91.1%) and prior study contacts (103/118, 87.3%) had higher retention than those recruited via partner-seeking apps (288/394, 73.1%) and other sources (23/36, 63.9%). After adjusting for demographics, social media (aOR 2.80, 95% CI 1.51-5.18) and study contacts (aOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.14-3.92) remained significantly associated with higher retention compared to partner-seeking apps. HIV-positive status (aOR 0.64) and gender-diverse identity (aOR 0.38) were independently associated with lower retention. The sensitivity analysis yielded directionally consistent findings, with the social media advantage remaining significant. The SMOTE-adjusted model improved recall for low-retention participants from 6% (2/33) to 64% (21/33) but reduced overall accuracy from 77.3% (116/150) to 64.7% (97/150). CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment source was associated with both participant characteristics and long-term retention in this digital HIV prevention intervention. Social media and prior research networks yielded higher retention, whereas partner-seeking apps reached populations at higher HIV risk but were associated with lower retention. Targeted retention strategies that account for both recruitment platform and participant characteristics (including HIV status and gender identity) may help optimize engagement and sample diversity in future digital health interventions targeting YBLMT.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.