Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Limited clinical translation of sepsis biomarkers highlights significant gap between discovery and deploymentFew Sepsis Biomarkers Are Currently Ready for Clinical Use

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note the significant gap between the discovery of sepsis biomarkers and their availability for clinical use.

This mini review evaluates the current landscape of sepsis biomarkers, including procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, lactate, presepsin, pancreatic stone protein, monocyte distribution width, mid-regional proadrenomedullin, and various transcriptomic and cellular host-response tests. The scope of the review focuses on diagnostic performance, risk stratification, treatment guidance, and the transition from laboratory discovery to clinical use.

The authors synthesize the finding that only a limited subset of hundreds of proposed biomarkers have successfully progressed to regulated in vitro diagnostic use. A persistent gap exists between the initial discovery of these biomarkers and their practical deployment in clinical settings. The review emphasizes that many emerging technologies are not yet available for routine clinical use.

Clinical implications center on the need for integrated host-response, near-patient, and functional immune assays to improve early triage and antimicrobial stewardship. While the review identifies several promising biomarkers, the lack of regulatory approval and integration into clinical workflows limits their current utility in managing sepsis.

How this fits prior evidence

This review addresses a gap in the clinical translation of sepsis diagnostics. While prior evidence noted that machine learning models achieve a pooled AUROC of 0.913 for sepsis prediction, this review highlights that many of the underlying biomarkers lack regulatory approval for clinical use. It complements the existing evidence on risk models for sepsis-associated acute kidney injury, which showed a pooled C-statistic of 0.817, by highlighting the practical limitations of translating laboratory findings into bedside tools.

Sepsis is a serious and fast-moving condition. Researchers have identified hundreds of potential biomarkers, such as procalcitonin and C-reactive protein, that could help doctors identify the illness earlier and manage treatment better. These markers are intended to help with early triage and choosing the right antibiotics.

However, this review shows a significant gap between finding a biomarker and using it in a hospital. Even though many markers have been discovered in labs, only a small number have moved forward to become regulated tools for doctors. This means many of the promising tests are not yet available for everyday clinical use.

Patients and providers should know that while research into sepsis markers is active, most of these tests are not yet standard practice. The goal for future research is to create more functional and practical tests that can be used quickly at the patient's side to improve outcomes.

What this means for you:
Many sepsis biomarkers are still in the research phase and are not yet widely available for clinical use.

Common questions

What are some examples of sepsis biomarkers?

Several biomarkers have been identified in research, including procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, lactate, and presepsin. Other markers include pancreatic stone protein, monocyte distribution width, and mid-regional proadrenomedullin. While these are being studied to help with triage and treatment, many are not yet available for routine clinical use.

Are these biomarkers currently used to treat sepsis?

There is currently a gap between the discovery of these biomarkers and their use in hospitals. While many have been identified in studies, only a limited subset of the hundreds of proposed biomarkers have progressed to regulated use. You should talk to a doctor about what specific tests are currently available for your care.

How can these biomarkers help patients with sepsis?

If implemented, these biomarkers could help with early triage and antimicrobial stewardship. They are intended to help doctors identify the condition sooner and guide treatment decisions. However, because many are still in the research phase, they are not yet standard tools for all patients.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Sepsis remains a diagnostic challenge because early clinical manifestations are non-specific and microbiological confirmation often arrives too late to guide first-hour decisions. The 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines reinforce early clinical recognition using validated clinical scores, appropriate diagnostic strategies, and responsible antimicrobial use and de-escalation. Yet, initial management still frequently occurs under diagnostic uncertainty. Hundreds of biomarkers have been proposed to improve sepsis diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment guidance; however, only a limited subset has progressed from discovery to regulated in vitro diagnostic use. This Mini Review examines selected sepsis biomarkers and diagnostic platforms with emphasis on technologies that have reached certified or cleared IVD implementation, or that illustrate a credible route toward regulated use. We discuss conventional soluble biomarkers such as procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and lactate; emerging severity and host-response markers including presepsin, pancreatic stone protein, monocyte distribution width and mid-regional proadrenomedullin; transcriptomic and cellular host-response tests; and functional immune technologies such as the LPS-induced TNF-alpha release assay, also referred to as TARA. Rather than ranking biomarkers solely by diagnostic performance, we emphasize intended clinical use, biological rationale, sample type, turnaround time, regulatory status and workflow compatibility. The review highlights the persistent gap between biomarker discovery and clinical deployment, set against an evolving regulatory landscape shaped by the EU IVDR and the phased rollout of EUDAMED. Future sepsis diagnostics will likely move beyond isolated inflammatory analytes toward integrated host-response, near-patient and functional immune assays able to support early triage, risk stratification, antimicrobial stewardship and precision immune monitoring.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.