Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Pre-XDR-TB affects 3% and XDR-TB 1% of MDR-TB patients in EthiopiaDrug-Resistant TB Strains Affect 4% of Ethiopian MDR-TB Patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Interpret Pre-XDR-TB and XDR-TB prevalence cautiously given publication bias.

This meta-analysis synthesized data from studies of MDR-TB patients in Ethiopia to estimate the prevalence of Pre-XDR-TB and XDR-TB. The analysis included 1,518 patients. Pooled prevalence of Pre-XDR-TB was 3% (95% CI: 2%-5%, I2 = 43.69%), corresponding to 52 cases. Pooled prevalence of XDR-TB was 1% (95% CI: 0%-4%, I2 = 54.07%), corresponding to 13 cases.

Regional estimates varied. Pre-XDR-TB prevalence was 7% (95% CI: 3%-13%) in multiple regions and 3% (95% CI: 2%-4%) in Addis Ababa. XDR-TB prevalence was 1% (95% CI: 0%-2%) in Addis Ababa and 10% (95% CI: 3%-26%) in Oromia based on a single study. By study year, XDR-TB prevalence was 3% (95% CI: 0%-11%) for 2005-2018 and 1% (95% CI: 0%-2%) for 2019-2024.

The authors note significant publication bias for XDR-TB prevalence (p = 0.024). No safety outcomes, adverse events, or tolerability data were reported. Funding and conflicts of interest were not reported. Follow-up duration was not reported.

The findings highlight the need for strengthened surveillance and expanded drug susceptibility testing for MDR-TB management in Ethiopia. The low overall prevalence estimates should be interpreted with caution given the observed publication bias and the limited number of studies for some regional and temporal estimates.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis provides national prevalence estimates for Pre-XDR-TB and XDR-TB in Ethiopia, a gap not addressed by prior coverage. It complements prior evidence on TB diagnostics, such as the pooled sensitivity and specificity of IP-10 for latent TB, and on treatment adherence with short-course regimens. Unlike prior items focused on HIV-exposed children or community health worker support, this analysis quantifies drug resistance among MDR-TB patients, reinforcing the need for expanded drug susceptibility testing.

A new analysis pooled data from studies of people in Ethiopia who already had multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). It looked at how many of them also had two harder-to-treat forms: pre-XDR-TB and XDR-TB. In total, 1,518 patients were included.

Overall, about 3% had pre-XDR-TB (52 cases) and about 1% had XDR-TB (13 cases). Rates varied by region. Pre-XDR-TB was 7% in some regions and 3% in Addis Ababa. XDR-TB was 1% in Addis Ababa and 10% in one study from Oromia. XDR-TB was more common in earlier years (3% for 2005-2018) than in recent years (1% for 2019-2024).

The analysis has limits. It found signs of publication bias for XDR-TB, meaning the true rate could be different. The number of XDR-TB cases was small, so regional estimates are uncertain. No information on side effects or treatment outcomes was reported.

What this means: drug-resistant TB strains are present in Ethiopia, but at relatively low levels overall. The findings support better monitoring and more drug susceptibility testing. If you have TB or are worried about drug resistance, talk with your doctor about testing and treatment options.

What this means for you:
In Ethiopia, about 4% of MDR-TB patients also had pre-XDR or XDR-TB, but data are limited.

Common questions

How common is pre-XDR-TB in Ethiopia?

In this analysis of 1,518 MDR-TB patients, about 3% had pre-XDR-TB, or 52 cases. Rates varied by region, reaching 7% in some areas and 3% in Addis Ababa. The overall estimate had a 95% confidence interval of 2% to 5%.

How common is XDR-TB in Ethiopia?

About 1% of MDR-TB patients in the analysis had XDR-TB, or 13 cases. The 95% confidence interval was 0% to 4%. One study from Oromia reported 10%, but that was based on a single study with a wide range.

Is XDR-TB becoming more or less common in Ethiopia?

The analysis looked at study year. XDR-TB prevalence was 3% for studies from 2005 to 2018 and 1% for studies from 2019 to 2024. This suggests a possible decrease over time, but the numbers are small and the analysis found signs of publication bias.

What are the limitations of this analysis?

The analysis found significant publication bias for XDR-TB, meaning the true rate could be different. The number of XDR-TB cases was small, so regional estimates are uncertain. No information on side effects or treatment outcomes was reported.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: The burden of pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (Pre-XDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) cases in Ethiopia has become one of the most challenging problems for monitoring the treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). This study aimed to provide a valuable evidence synthesis on the pooled prevalence of Pre-XDR and XDR-TB among MDR-TB patients in Ethiopia. METHODOLOGY: This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Extracted data from relevant articles were analyzed using STATA version 17.0. The pooled estimate of the effect size was computed using a restricted maximum likelihood random-effects model, considering a 95% confidence interval, and a forest plot was used to visualize the proportion of Pre-XDR and XDR-TB. Because the Pre-XDR and XDR-TB cases are rare, the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation was applied to estimate the pooled proportions. The I2 statistic and Galbraith plot confirmed heterogeneity. A univariate meta-regression, sensitivity, and subgroup analyses were conducted to identify the source of heterogeneity. Egger's test and funnel plot were used to check publication bias. RESULTS: Eight studies comprising 1,518 MDR-TB patients, with 656 new and 862 previously treated cases, were included. Among those, 52 Pre-XDR and 13 XDR-TB cases were identified. According to the Freeman-Tukey transformation, the overall pooled prevalence of Pre-XDR-TB was 3% (95% CI: 2%-5%, I2 = 43.69%) and XDR-TB was 1% (95% CI: 0%-4%, I2 = 54.07%). In the subgroup analysis, the prevalence of Pre-XDR-TB across studies from multiple regions of Ethiopia was 7% (95% CI: 3%-13%), and in Addis Ababa, it was 3% (95% CI: 2%-4%). Single studies in the Amhara, Tigray, and Oromia regions reported Pre-XDR-TB prevalence of 6%, 5%, and 3%, respectively. The pooled prevalence of XDR-TB in Addis Ababa was 1% (95% CI: 0%-2%). A single study conducted in Oromia reported a relatively higher prevalence of XDR-TB; 10% (95% CI: 3%-26%). Regarding the study year, the XDR-TB prevalence was 3% (95% CI: 0%-11%) in 2005-2018 and 1% (95% CI: 0%-2%) in 2019-2024. A statistically significant publication bias was observed in XDR-TB prevalence (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: There is a significant prevalence of Pre-XDR and XDR-TB cases among MDR-TB patients in Ethiopia. It highlights the need for strengthened surveillance in all regions and expanded drug susceptibility testing of local strains for better management of MDR-TB patients.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.