Shingles in the eye is a serious condition that can threaten vision. A recent analysis looked at whether taking daily oral antivirals could prevent a specific complication called stromal keratitis. This inflammation affects the cornea and can cause scarring. The researchers followed 527 patients for 12 months to see if the daily medication made a difference. They compared those taking the drug to those taking a placebo. The main goal was to protect sight by stopping the inflammation before it started. The results showed no difference in vision between the two groups. Stromal keratitis happened in 105 of the 527 participants regardless of the pill they took. This means the daily antiviral did not stop the inflammation from developing. The study also tracked how doctors treated the inflammation once it appeared. About 50 percent of patients received steroid eye drops. The type of steroid mattered less than the timing of the treatment. Many patients who stopped steroids earlier had to restart them later. This suggests that watching the eye closely is more important than the daily pill. The team found that low-potency steroid drops were a safe option for managing the inflammation. Patients generally kept good vision when doctors monitored them carefully. The study confirms that the daily antiviral alone is not enough to prevent this specific eye problem. Doctors should focus on recognizing the signs early and treating them quickly with drops.
Valacyclovir No Better Than Placebo for Stromal Keratitis in Herpes Zoster OphthalmicusOral antivirals do not prevent eye inflammation in shingles patients
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial evaluated the role of oral valacyclovir in preventing stromal keratitis (SK) among 527 patients with herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). Participants received either oral valacyclovir 1 g daily or placebo and were followed for 12 months.
The primary outcome was visual acuity at 12 months, which showed no difference between groups (logMAR 0.13 ± 0.2). Recurrent, new, or worsening SK occurred in 105 of 527 participants (20%), but randomization group was not associated with SK occurrence. Among the 105 SK episodes, 79 (75%) were recognized at scheduled study visits. Masked investigators treated 11 of 105 instances (10%) with open-label oral antiviral.
Regarding topical steroid use, 52 of 105 participants (50%) received topical steroids at SK complication. Among those, 21 of 47 (45%) used high-potency steroids and 26 of 47 (55%) used low-potency steroids (P = .47). Notably, 48 of 105 participants (47%) received no topical steroids at SK complication. Of those, 18 of 48 (38%) had discontinued steroids in the prior 3 months, and 38 of 48 (75%) were subsequently treated with high-potency steroids twice daily or more. Among low-potency steroid users, 23 of 26 (88%) required only increased frequency.
Safety data were not reported. Limitations include the post-hoc nature of the analysis and lack of statistical testing for many comparisons. Clinically, patients with HZO who develop SK generally maintain very good vision without oral antiviral therapy when monitored closely. Low-potency topical steroids should be considered for treatment and suppression of SK.