Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review compares viral and bacterial pathogen mechanisms in respiratory infections

Systematic review compares viral and bacterial pathogen mechanisms in respiratory infections
Photo by masakazu sasaki / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note distinct pathogen mechanisms guide phenotype distinction and therapy development.

This systematic review examines the biological mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A Virus, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. The scope covers receptor recognition, cellular injury pathways, and immunopathological responses. The authors highlight that SARS-CoV-2 relies on ACE2 receptors and TMPRSS2-mediated membrane fusion, whereas Influenza A identifies sialic acid receptors via hemagglutinin. Mycoplasma utilizes specialized attachment organelles for gliding colonization.

Regarding cellular injury, the review indicates SARS-CoV-2 hijacks the endoplasmic reticulum to induce stress responses and promote syncytium formation. Influenza A targets mitochondria to trigger apoptosis and cellular necrosis. Mycoplasma utilizes hydrogen peroxide and CARDS toxin to implement oxidative damage and vacuolating toxicity. Immunopathological mechanisms differ as well, with SARS-CoV-2 inducing a delayed interferon response and cytokine storm, Influenza A triggering excessive formation of NETs, and Mycoplasma mediating activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome.

The review concludes that distinct acute injury mechanisms determine differentiated long-term prognoses such as pulmonary fibrosis, airway hyperresponsiveness, and airway remodeling. The authors acknowledge a paucity of systematic reviews offering a comparative analysis between these pathogens. Elucidating these commonalities and specificities has significant clinical guidance value for precisely distinguishing clinical phenotypes, predicting disease progression, and developing host-directed therapies targeting specific injury pathways.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Respiratory infectious diseases remain a major global public health challenge. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Influenza A Virus (IAV), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP), as three representative respiratory pathogens, all clinically cause airway epithelial shedding, ciliary dysfunction, and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Notably, they are the common triggers of acute respiratory infections characterized by persistent and severe cough, a clinical hallmark rooted in the structural disintegration of the airway mucosal barrier. However, the molecular mechanisms by which they compromise the airway mucosal barrier exhibit significant heterogeneity. Currently, there is a paucity of systematic reviews offering a comparative analysis between these viral and atypical bacterial pathogens. This review comprehensively examines the pathogenic mechanisms of these three agents across four dimensions: receptor recognition, direct cytotoxicity, immunopathology, and abnormal tissue repair. Studies indicate that during the invasion phase, SARS-CoV-2 relies on the Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor and Transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2) -mediated membrane fusion; IAV identifies sialic acid receptors via hemagglutinin, whereas MP utilizes specialized attachment organelles for “gliding” colonization. Regarding cellular injury mechanisms, SARS-CoV-2 primarily hijacks the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to induce stress responses and promote syncytium formation; IAV predominantly targets mitochondria to trigger apoptosis and cellular necrosis; while MP utilizes hydrogen peroxide and Community-Acquired Respiratory Distress Syndrome (CARDS) toxin to implement oxidative damage and vacuolating toxicity. At the immunopathological level, SARS-CoV-2-induced delayed interferon response and cytokine storm, IAV-triggered excessive formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and MP-mediated activation of the NOD-like receptor thermal protein domain associated protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome are key drivers exacerbating airway injury. Furthermore, distinct acute injury mechanisms determine differentiated long-term prognoses, such as pulmonary fibrosis, airway hyperresponsiveness, and airway remodeling. In summary, elucidating the commonalities and specificities of these mechanisms has significant clinical guidance value for precisely distinguishing clinical phenotypes, predicting disease progression, and developing host-directed therapies targeting specific injury pathways.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.